<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Managing Volume Sizes for CIFS Shares in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Managing-Volume-Sizes-for-CIFS-Shares/m-p/89911#M5755</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Volume Sizes – CIFS Shares – Business Units&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clustered OnTap 8.2.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Opinions / thoughts for management of volumes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have inherited a system where the CIFS shares are created based on business divisions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each share is at the volume level and in each volume, there are qtrees for the entities within a business division. Qtrees are used for chargebacks. Total used space is around 175 TB…give or take.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the volumes are TDP SnapMirrored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I understand that I can have large volumes, I am a bit concerned about managing 20TB plus volumes and the impact of growth with the current design.&amp;nbsp;I have had to manage 500TB to 1PB single namespace systems and it’s all good until time to perform maintenance tasks or scan the entire file system or something unforeseen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to get to the point and specific questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For those of you with thousands of users accessing your shares, what size do you like to keep your volumes?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Do you try to maintain a specific max volume size?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What methods do you use to maintain an organized structure, with a given set of shares and maintaining a max-volume size limit?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Anyone&amp;nbsp;using widelinks to maintain common shares, while allowing for smaller volume divisions?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I&amp;nbsp;overthinking things&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;should I be a bit concerned with the current strategy I have inherited?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your opinions!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ken&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KenO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:28:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Managing Volume Sizes for CIFS Shares</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Managing-Volume-Sizes-for-CIFS-Shares/m-p/89911#M5755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Volume Sizes – CIFS Shares – Business Units&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clustered OnTap 8.2.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Opinions / thoughts for management of volumes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have inherited a system where the CIFS shares are created based on business divisions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each share is at the volume level and in each volume, there are qtrees for the entities within a business division. Qtrees are used for chargebacks. Total used space is around 175 TB…give or take.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the volumes are TDP SnapMirrored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I understand that I can have large volumes, I am a bit concerned about managing 20TB plus volumes and the impact of growth with the current design.&amp;nbsp;I have had to manage 500TB to 1PB single namespace systems and it’s all good until time to perform maintenance tasks or scan the entire file system or something unforeseen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to get to the point and specific questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For those of you with thousands of users accessing your shares, what size do you like to keep your volumes?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Do you try to maintain a specific max volume size?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What methods do you use to maintain an organized structure, with a given set of shares and maintaining a max-volume size limit?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Anyone&amp;nbsp;using widelinks to maintain common shares, while allowing for smaller volume divisions?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I&amp;nbsp;overthinking things&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;should I be a bit concerned with the current strategy I have inherited?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your opinions!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ken&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Managing-Volume-Sizes-for-CIFS-Shares/m-p/89911#M5755</guid>
      <dc:creator>KenO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:28:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

