<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Running 8.1 Cluster in FAS 3040 iSCSI and NFS in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Running-8-1-Cluster-in-FAS-3040-iSCSI-and-NFS/m-p/98217#M5994</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, an year ago we upgrade our 3040 to 3240, so now we going to use this old 3040 for lab and other IT operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i upgrade it to 8.1.4 Cluster, the lastest Ontap that support 3040, and i design to use iSCSI because i like it's MPIO, whihc NFS doesn't do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now i am running some branchmark in it mutiple VMs under either single NFS or single iSCSI Lun, i found iSCSI are slower then NFS a lot under load. this is a bit supprise me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i would expect an even or iSCSI faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i know that 3040 running in cluster 8.1.4 does not support SAN at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but i wounder anyone out there tested 8.1.4 iSCSI and NFS performance in their lab?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which could give me a light on which i should use? and why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff Fung&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>berman002</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:22:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Running 8.1 Cluster in FAS 3040 iSCSI and NFS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Running-8-1-Cluster-in-FAS-3040-iSCSI-and-NFS/m-p/98217#M5994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, an year ago we upgrade our 3040 to 3240, so now we going to use this old 3040 for lab and other IT operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i upgrade it to 8.1.4 Cluster, the lastest Ontap that support 3040, and i design to use iSCSI because i like it's MPIO, whihc NFS doesn't do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now i am running some branchmark in it mutiple VMs under either single NFS or single iSCSI Lun, i found iSCSI are slower then NFS a lot under load. this is a bit supprise me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i would expect an even or iSCSI faster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i know that 3040 running in cluster 8.1.4 does not support SAN at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but i wounder anyone out there tested 8.1.4 iSCSI and NFS performance in their lab?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which could give me a light on which i should use? and why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff Fung&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Running-8-1-Cluster-in-FAS-3040-iSCSI-and-NFS/m-p/98217#M5994</guid>
      <dc:creator>berman002</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

