<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS2040 adding new SAS disks to the head unit in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2040-adding-new-SAS-disks-to-the-head-unit/m-p/98729#M6035</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's all a matter a preference really. Whether you want to have an active-active vs active-standby. &amp;nbsp;Yes, an active/active configuration requires more disks, because of the additional aggregate and raid groups, however both controllers are actively utilized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind that even if you want to assign all disk to a one of the heads/controller you can't, the standby head/controlle still needs to have a root volume, aggregate and thefore raid group in order to boot ONTAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/system/pdf-reader.aspx?pdfuri=tcm:10-61088-16&amp;amp;m=tr-3450.pdf"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/system/pdf-reader.aspx?pdfuri=tcm:10-61088-16&amp;amp;m=tr-3450.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:47:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>joelg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-26T14:47:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS2040 adding new SAS disks to the head unit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2040-adding-new-SAS-disks-to-the-head-unit/m-p/98722#M6034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a FAS2040 dual controller (active/active) with an external shelf that contains all the disks in the system.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking to add 12 SATA disks to the head unit and wanted to know some recommendations for the disk assignments.&amp;nbsp; For the current disks, 1/2 the disks are owned by controller A and 1/2 the disks are owned by controller B.&amp;nbsp; Is this how it should be configured?&amp;nbsp; Isn't there alot of wasted disks in this configuration?&amp;nbsp; Would it be better to have all the disks owned by one of the controllers?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2040-adding-new-SAS-disks-to-the-head-unit/m-p/98722#M6034</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffJ22</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2040 adding new SAS disks to the head unit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2040-adding-new-SAS-disks-to-the-head-unit/m-p/98729#M6035</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's all a matter a preference really. Whether you want to have an active-active vs active-standby. &amp;nbsp;Yes, an active/active configuration requires more disks, because of the additional aggregate and raid groups, however both controllers are actively utilized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind that even if you want to assign all disk to a one of the heads/controller you can't, the standby head/controlle still needs to have a root volume, aggregate and thefore raid group in order to boot ONTAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/system/pdf-reader.aspx?pdfuri=tcm:10-61088-16&amp;amp;m=tr-3450.pdf"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/system/pdf-reader.aspx?pdfuri=tcm:10-61088-16&amp;amp;m=tr-3450.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:47:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2040-adding-new-SAS-disks-to-the-head-unit/m-p/98729#M6035</guid>
      <dc:creator>joelg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-26T14:47:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

