<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple &amp;quot;Block recommended for reassignment on Disk&amp;quot; in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24245#M6464</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is nothing new related to media errors detection in &lt;STRONG&gt;ONTAP &lt;/STRONG&gt;version &lt;STRONG&gt;7.3.7&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is a little information about failure thresholds:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, it just says:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;More than twenty-five media errors (that are not related to disk scrub activity) occurring on a disk within a ten-minute period&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and THESE ARE media errors &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;during&lt;/SPAN&gt; scrub activity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tomasz_golebiewski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-17T21:59:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24222#M6460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;since U'r support is closed and I cannot even open new low priority case with NetApp I wanna ask is it ok to have multiple errors:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Sun Feb 16 19:22:15 CET [filer: raid.rg.scrub.media.recommend.reassign.err:info]: Block recommended for reassignment on Disk /aggr1/plex0/rg0/0d.01.2 Shelf 1 Bay 2 [NETAPP&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; X410_HVIPC288A15 NA02] S/N [XXXXXXXX], block #2280307 during scrub&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I belive ONTAP should predict failure and mark the drive offline, but it still tries to save the drive every week during scrub.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;drive: &lt;STRONG&gt;X410_HVIPC288A15&lt;/STRONG&gt;, fw: &lt;STRONG&gt;NA02&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;OS: &lt;STRONG&gt;ONTAP 7.3.6&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;inside shelf &lt;STRONG&gt;DS4243&lt;/STRONG&gt;: IOM3, fw: &lt;STRONG&gt;0172&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I send manual autosupport, in section "&lt;EM&gt;Disk defect list for disks that have reported errors&lt;/EM&gt;" it says "&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disk 0d.01.2 grown defect list has 396 entries&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;" so we're aware of data consistency..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In one scrub there are 4 up to 39 media errors reported on single drive.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24222#M6460</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomasz_golebiewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24227#M6461</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can manually fail the drive or disk replace the drive.&amp;nbsp; Also from priv set advanced check disk shm_stats for the storage health monitor counters.&amp;nbsp; Or all into support for the recommendation (probably disk replace and rma of the drive).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24227#M6461</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-16T23:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24235#M6462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, we know about manually setting drive as failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, this should be done by ONTAP anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/24846_fas-disk-status.PNG" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these values correct? There are pretty .. unbelievable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24235#M6462</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomasz_golebiewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-17T11:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24240#M6463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes we have to manually fail disks but agree it should catch these when errors can't be corrected. It may be a threshold not caught in this ontap release but fixed in a newer release. Definitely worth calling in a case to see if a higher release will fail this drive or why it isn't being failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24240#M6463</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-17T15:40:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24245#M6464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is nothing new related to media errors detection in &lt;STRONG&gt;ONTAP &lt;/STRONG&gt;version &lt;STRONG&gt;7.3.7&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1134331&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is a little information about failure thresholds:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278110/html/mgmtsag/4raid22.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, it just says:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;More than twenty-five media errors (that are not related to disk scrub activity) occurring on a disk within a ten-minute period&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and THESE ARE media errors &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;during&lt;/SPAN&gt; scrub activity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:59:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24245#M6464</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomasz_golebiewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-17T21:59:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24250#M6465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Agreed...based on the counters it is a candidate for failure.&amp;nbsp; Definitely worth having support look into it and could be an existing BURT fixed in a newer release of ONTAP or drive firmware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 04:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24250#M6465</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-18T04:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple "Block recommended for reassignment on Disk"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24254#M6466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The drive has failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Multiple-quot-Block-recommended-for-reassignment-on-Disk-quot/m-p/24254#M6466</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomasz_golebiewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-27T14:20:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

