<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OpenSSL vulnerability - Logjam in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106303#M6608</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are any NetApp systems vulnerable to the Logjam (CVE-2015-4000) vulnerability?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>craiglittle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:09:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OpenSSL vulnerability - Logjam</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106303#M6608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are any NetApp systems vulnerable to the Logjam (CVE-2015-4000) vulnerability?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106303#M6608</guid>
      <dc:creator>craiglittle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:09:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenSSL vulnerability - Logjam</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106305#M6609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not aware of an official statement from NetApp relating specifically to CVE-2015-4000. OpenSSL vulnerabitiies applicable to NetApp are listing in the following KB article:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=9010028&amp;amp;locale=en_US" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=9010028&amp;amp;locale=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=9010028&amp;amp;locale=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are concerned about the potential exposure to this vulnerability i'd advise raising a support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 02:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106305#M6609</guid>
      <dc:creator>mbeattie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-17T02:10:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OpenSSL vulnerability - Logjam</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106308#M6610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Matt,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have subsequently found this link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=9010038&amp;amp;locale=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=9010038&amp;amp;locale=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So they are looking into it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 02:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/OpenSSL-vulnerability-Logjam/m-p/106308#M6610</guid>
      <dc:creator>craiglittle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-17T02:47:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

