<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Disk Sanitization with ADP in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Disk-Sanitization-with-ADP/m-p/107738#M6700</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our PSEs was sent to a customer to sanitize the disks on a FAS8060 AFF eval.&amp;nbsp; We had ADP running... one speedbump was he had to go back to non-adp (root-uses-shared-disks, root-configuration) and option 4 zero then was able to sanitize after.&amp;nbsp; A note of the extra pre-zero needed if running evals since sanitize didn't run on ADP aggr disks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T23:40:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disk Sanitization with ADP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Disk-Sanitization-with-ADP/m-p/107738#M6700</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our PSEs was sent to a customer to sanitize the disks on a FAS8060 AFF eval.&amp;nbsp; We had ADP running... one speedbump was he had to go back to non-adp (root-uses-shared-disks, root-configuration) and option 4 zero then was able to sanitize after.&amp;nbsp; A note of the extra pre-zero needed if running evals since sanitize didn't run on ADP aggr disks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Disk-Sanitization-with-ADP/m-p/107738#M6700</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T23:40:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

