<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: cascading VIFS types :: disruptive/non-disruptive in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117358#M7332</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in your environment the interface active is only the&amp;nbsp;multi_master. The multi_slave is passive and the workload on that is none.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So feel free to put down all the link on the slave and everthing will be the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also if you put the master, with the slave up, the super-vif will be up because automatically switch to the multi_slave vif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roberto&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ghislanzoni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-22T13:59:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>cascading VIFS types :: disruptive/non-disruptive</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117352#M7331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today, I plan to change our interface config for one of our filers (FAS3070).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our setup is as following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 * 1 GBit Ethernet-Ports&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;vif create multi multi_master e0a e0b e0c e0d
vif create multi multi_slave e4a e4b e4c e4d
vif create single svif multi_master multi_slave
vif favour multi_master&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I want to take down multi_slave due to cabling changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it non-disruptive to take the "passive" vif multi_slave in this config down?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've read some information from a NetApp-KB&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=3010095" target="_blank"&gt;How does load balancing on a VIF work&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and think that it should be non-disruptive, because a VIF configured as a single VIF only uses 1 child-interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not found any setup combining 2 multi&amp;nbsp;VIFsto a single VIF. Does anybody have experience with such cascading VIF setups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx 4 any answer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jenoptik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117352#M7331</guid>
      <dc:creator>jenoptik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cascading VIFS types :: disruptive/non-disruptive</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117358#M7332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in your environment the interface active is only the&amp;nbsp;multi_master. The multi_slave is passive and the workload on that is none.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So feel free to put down all the link on the slave and everthing will be the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also if you put the master, with the slave up, the super-vif will be up because automatically switch to the multi_slave vif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roberto&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117358#M7332</guid>
      <dc:creator>ghislanzoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T13:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cascading VIFS types :: disruptive/non-disruptive</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117363#M7333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for that information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It helped me a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/cascading-VIFS-types-disruptive-non-disruptive/m-p/117363#M7333</guid>
      <dc:creator>jenoptik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-22T14:28:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

