<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a best practice for maximum used for an aggregate in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125500#M7746</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sahana,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the details and reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new to the Netapp world and my predecessors did not leave much in the way of documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a good weekend,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GlenG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-18T16:31:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a best practice for maximum used for an aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125477#M7744</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a FAS3250 with 3 aggregates - one with SAS disks, one with 2TB SATA and one with 4TB SATA.&amp;nbsp; Percentage wise they are showing 86% to 96% used.&amp;nbsp; Is there a best practice for the maximum that should be allocated?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's part of OnCommand screenshot showing the details.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="NetappAaggrUsed20161117.jpg" style="width: 922px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6429i5CEF01FDFC299CEE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="NetappAaggrUsed20161117.jpg" alt="NetappAaggrUsed20161117.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Glen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125477#M7744</guid>
      <dc:creator>GlenG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:13:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a best practice for maximum used for an aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125480#M7745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It is recommended to keep a minimum of 3 % of space kept free on the aggregate . Which means that the aggregate should not be used more that 97% ever.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally I would recomend the aggregate is not used more that 95% . The extra 2% will come in handy if all your aggregate / volume space is used .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Yes you can resize the volume down later if necessary without any interuptions provided there is space unused in the volume. For example you have a 100G volume which has used 60G already . You can now resize the volume down upto 60G , Please note that the volume used space becomes 100% now and run out of space. so you may want to resize to 70G or 80G depending upon your need to get the space back to aggregate .&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Netapp recomends to grow ( add disks) your aggregate when the utilization approach 80% - 85 % for better performance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/aggregate-recommended-free-space/td-p/18572" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/aggregate-recommended-free-space/td-p/18572&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:39:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125480#M7745</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T04:39:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a best practice for maximum used for an aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125500#M7746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sahana,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the details and reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new to the Netapp world and my predecessors did not leave much in the way of documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a good weekend,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Is-there-a-best-practice-for-maximum-used-for-an-aggregate/m-p/125500#M7746</guid>
      <dc:creator>GlenG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T16:31:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

