<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CPU overhead from monitoring in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/CPU-overhead-from-monitoring/m-p/129778#M7980</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for a little light reading material - I bookmarked the following a few months back to help me keep track of the various domains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000fzcQAA/faq-cpu-utilization-in-data-ontap-scheduling-and-monitoring?language=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000fzcQAA/faq-cpu-utilization-in-data-ontap-scheduling-and-monitoring?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I vaguely recall us working a case a long time ago (7mode - 8.0.x) where we had an nSanity gather going against an Exchange host and our filers. &amp;nbsp;Anyway, with 8.0, Kahuna would manifest itself on a single core which would skew our ANY statistic. &amp;nbsp;What I remember is that during the nSanity gather (and during a subsequent perfstat gather) we'd see that Kahuna-owned core spike in relation to whatever performance gather we had going on. &amp;nbsp;I don't know how that behavior translates into ONTAP, but it makes me suspect that monitoring gets reflected more in the Kahuna/wafl_ex domains vs. the HostOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a relatively quiet 8.3 cluster that we're in the process of decommissioning. &amp;nbsp;If I have time I'll fire up a perfstat against it and see what domain is getting the business.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>colsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-04T12:25:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU overhead from monitoring</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/CPU-overhead-from-monitoring/m-p/129772#M7979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would all CPU load created by monitoring processes be reflected in the load produced in the hostos domain?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/CPU-overhead-from-monitoring/m-p/129772#M7979</guid>
      <dc:creator>dryan0211</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU overhead from monitoring</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/CPU-overhead-from-monitoring/m-p/129778#M7980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for a little light reading material - I bookmarked the following a few months back to help me keep track of the various domains:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000fzcQAA/faq-cpu-utilization-in-data-ontap-scheduling-and-monitoring?language=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka21A0000000fzcQAA/faq-cpu-utilization-in-data-ontap-scheduling-and-monitoring?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I vaguely recall us working a case a long time ago (7mode - 8.0.x) where we had an nSanity gather going against an Exchange host and our filers. &amp;nbsp;Anyway, with 8.0, Kahuna would manifest itself on a single core which would skew our ANY statistic. &amp;nbsp;What I remember is that during the nSanity gather (and during a subsequent perfstat gather) we'd see that Kahuna-owned core spike in relation to whatever performance gather we had going on. &amp;nbsp;I don't know how that behavior translates into ONTAP, but it makes me suspect that monitoring gets reflected more in the Kahuna/wafl_ex domains vs. the HostOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a relatively quiet 8.3 cluster that we're in the process of decommissioning. &amp;nbsp;If I have time I'll fire up a perfstat against it and see what domain is getting the business.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/CPU-overhead-from-monitoring/m-p/129778#M7980</guid>
      <dc:creator>colsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-04T12:25:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

