<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131093#M8083</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You could go R4 (3D+1P) but that depends on your risk tolorance. &amp;nbsp;Remember that if you loose your storage pool both your aggregates will go offline as well. &amp;nbsp;I dont think that is a risk worth taking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 14:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AFlowers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-16T14:58:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131090#M8080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to install FAS252 with 4 SSDs and 20 SAS in the base and 24 SAS in the external shelf. As I understand it the ADP is done only on the disks in the base. I want to create only one data aggregate for each node. I see as a good idea not to mix data partiotions from the base and the disks from the shelf. So I would like to create data aggregate for the first node only from the data partitions from&amp;nbsp;the base and the data aggregate for the second node from the disks from the external shelf.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is if it is a good idea or if there could be any issues. Is there any better&amp;nbsp;recommendation for this setup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131090#M8080</guid>
      <dc:creator>maskajan09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:04:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131091#M8081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have setup multiple systems as you have described and it has worked well. &amp;nbsp;You can also create a storage pool with the SSD and split them between the two aggregates. &amp;nbsp;Unless you have a specific workload that you need to design against that is the route that i would go.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 14:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131091#M8081</guid>
      <dc:creator>AFlowers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-16T14:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131092#M8082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perfect. Glad to hear that it is ok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Flash pool is my second question. I'm affraid that I will always lose 2 disks - DP or r4+spare. Is it correct? Can I go for r4 (3D+1P) for a Flash pool?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 14:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131092#M8082</guid>
      <dc:creator>maskajan09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-16T14:48:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131093#M8083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could go R4 (3D+1P) but that depends on your risk tolorance. &amp;nbsp;Remember that if you loose your storage pool both your aggregates will go offline as well. &amp;nbsp;I dont think that is a risk worth taking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 14:58:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131093#M8083</guid>
      <dc:creator>AFlowers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-16T14:58:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2552 disk partition (ADP) and data aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131130#M8084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need a spare SSD&amp;nbsp;for SSD Storage Pool (FlashPool), so you can configure 1S+2D+1P (R4) or 1S+1D+2P (R6).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, I believe&amp;nbsp;following configuration&amp;nbsp;is better ballanced one;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS2552A, HDD x44, SSD x4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Node-1: ADP_Root + [1S+7D+2P] + (1S+9D+2P) + 2AU&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Node-2: ADP_Root + [1S+7D+2P] + (1S+9D+2P)&amp;nbsp;+ 2AU&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[...] is a RAID group with ADP data partitions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(...) is a RAID group with&amp;nbsp;phisical disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AU is&amp;nbsp;Allocation Unit of SSD Storage Pool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 07:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2552-disk-partition-ADP-and-data-aggregates/m-p/131130#M8084</guid>
      <dc:creator>kenji_toyooka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-18T07:46:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

