<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FAS2600 with ONTAP 9.2: failover to other node if all data network paths to the first node fail? in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133879#M8314</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to design the network topology for our new FAS2620 two node HA pair running 9.2. At this point it's likely we'll run active/passive.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My intention is to to create a LACP network pair on each node for the data path, and put the primary node on one switch cluster, and the secondary node on another switch cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The switch clusters are Aruba/HP ProCurve 2920 systems, where the only true single point of failure is the switch stack software, OR when I update the switch stack code, and that takes about three minutes, which brings the stack down during that time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the LIF and node failover policies available to us in Ontap 9.2, if the switch stack connected to the primary node goes down resulting in a complete lack of connectivity&amp;nbsp;to the data path of the primary node, is there a way to get the passive secondary node to take automatically take over in some way, either through full failover, or just grabbing the lif?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this isn't possible with active/passive, is it possible with active/active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've read the docs, but my naiviety made them a bit opaque as to this particular scenario.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nhwanderer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:41:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS2600 with ONTAP 9.2: failover to other node if all data network paths to the first node fail?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133879#M8314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to design the network topology for our new FAS2620 two node HA pair running 9.2. At this point it's likely we'll run active/passive.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My intention is to to create a LACP network pair on each node for the data path, and put the primary node on one switch cluster, and the secondary node on another switch cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The switch clusters are Aruba/HP ProCurve 2920 systems, where the only true single point of failure is the switch stack software, OR when I update the switch stack code, and that takes about three minutes, which brings the stack down during that time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the LIF and node failover policies available to us in Ontap 9.2, if the switch stack connected to the primary node goes down resulting in a complete lack of connectivity&amp;nbsp;to the data path of the primary node, is there a way to get the passive secondary node to take automatically take over in some way, either through full failover, or just grabbing the lif?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this isn't possible with active/passive, is it possible with active/active?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've read the docs, but my naiviety made them a bit opaque as to this particular scenario.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133879#M8314</guid>
      <dc:creator>nhwanderer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:41:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2600 with ONTAP 9.2: failover to other node if all data network paths to the first node fail?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133881#M8315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For NAS lifs, the interface will failover to another port within the broadcast domain, even if&amp;nbsp;that means moving it to some other node in the cluster. &amp;nbsp;The data lif and the aggregate don't have to be on the same node. &amp;nbsp;Ensure that the broadcast domain(s) contain ports from both nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For SAN lifs, the interface does not fail over. &amp;nbsp;Instead SAN lifs are placed on both nodes, and host side multi-pathing and ALUA take care of path selection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In either case a storage failover is not needed. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133881#M8315</guid>
      <dc:creator>SeanHatfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-23T23:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2600 with ONTAP 9.2: failover to other node if all data network paths to the first node fail?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133886#M8317</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks you, that's very helpful. We'll be running NAS (nfs to vmware).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:28:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2600-with-ONTAP-9-2-failover-to-other-node-if-all-data-network-paths-to-the/m-p/133886#M8317</guid>
      <dc:creator>nhwanderer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-24T00:28:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

