<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sizing for FlexArray in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Sizing-for-FlexArray/m-p/134535#M8394</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi larse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the question really relates to what the front end workload looks like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the plan to put the FAS9000 in front of the VMAX and move the workloads 1:1 block from the VMAX to the NetApp system? I suggest the &lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.vs-irrg%2Fhome.html" target="_self"&gt;FlexArray guide&lt;/A&gt; is the best place to start reading.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 03:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-18T03:09:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sizing for FlexArray</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Sizing-for-FlexArray/m-p/134522#M8393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does anybody has a good idea on how to size FAS900 in front of an 8-frame VMAX ? We want to ensure that the FAS9000 is not running out of power ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have quite limited insight into the performance characteristic of the VMAX environment so a good rule of thumb would be highly appreciated - my own idea is that a FAS900 HA system should be sufficient but I might be completely off ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lars&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Sizing-for-FlexArray/m-p/134522#M8393</guid>
      <dc:creator>larse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:35:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing for FlexArray</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Sizing-for-FlexArray/m-p/134535#M8394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi larse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the question really relates to what the front end workload looks like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the plan to put the FAS9000 in front of the VMAX and move the workloads 1:1 block from the VMAX to the NetApp system? I suggest the &lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.vs-irrg%2Fhome.html" target="_self"&gt;FlexArray guide&lt;/A&gt; is the best place to start reading.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 03:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Sizing-for-FlexArray/m-p/134535#M8394</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-18T03:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

