<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Active/Passive and keeping a parition for core dumps in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135358#M8470</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having a bit of a hard time understanding if I need a data parition for core dumps on the passive node of my active/passive system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're running Ontap 9.1p8 on a FAS2620 with ADP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg/GUID-4AC35094-4077-4F1E-8D6E-82BF111354B0.html" target="_blank"&gt;This Ontap 9 article about active/passive says nothing about a spare parition on the second node.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg/GUID-1C0DF65F-4EB1-4729-A0FC-A2A8A6278664.html" target="_blank"&gt;This Onap 9 article about correctign misaligned spares says every node needs a spare data parition for core dumps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In either case, when I first setup the system and fully populated the active node with the data paritions, holding one back for a spare data parition on the passive node, the active node almost immediately "stole" that data parition through a disk copy that it apparently started all by itself.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any input!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nhwanderer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:28:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active/Passive and keeping a parition for core dumps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135358#M8470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having a bit of a hard time understanding if I need a data parition for core dumps on the passive node of my active/passive system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're running Ontap 9.1p8 on a FAS2620 with ADP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg/GUID-4AC35094-4077-4F1E-8D6E-82BF111354B0.html" target="_blank"&gt;This Ontap 9 article about active/passive says nothing about a spare parition on the second node.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/topic/com.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg/GUID-1C0DF65F-4EB1-4729-A0FC-A2A8A6278664.html" target="_blank"&gt;This Onap 9 article about correctign misaligned spares says every node needs a spare data parition for core dumps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In either case, when I first setup the system and fully populated the active node with the data paritions, holding one back for a spare data parition on the passive node, the active node almost immediately "stole" that data parition through a disk copy that it apparently started all by itself.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any input!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135358#M8470</guid>
      <dc:creator>nhwanderer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:28:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Passive and keeping a parition for core dumps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135381#M8471</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, to confirm you need a drive with both spare data and root partitions owned by the node to perform a core dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, to maximise capacity&amp;nbsp;only a single spare drive&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;normally&amp;nbsp;allocated across the HA-Pair. Both nodes will have a single spare root partition, but only the active node will have&amp;nbsp;a single data partition. This means we cannot guarantee&amp;nbsp;a core dump from the passive node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this make sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Grant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135381#M8471</guid>
      <dc:creator>sgrant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T14:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Passive and keeping a parition for core dumps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135415#M8473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll also add - the situations where you need a core-dump are very limited - and from a passive node, even more so. For the sake of efficiency, I wouldn't bother making provisions for it on a FAS2620.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 04:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Active-Passive-and-keeping-a-parition-for-core-dumps/m-p/135415#M8473</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-19T04:58:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

