<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: v-series / FAS8200 interoperability in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140232#M8817</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks G for your input&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes its a 7mode 8.2.3P6 V3240/V3270 against ( i believe) cmode 9.3 on the 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your asked about attaching&amp;nbsp; shelves to existing V-series ...our client has bought an 8200 to act as a target for a mixed bag which includes the V-series hosts ...so only available shelves ..5 of them..are on the 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So not even worth zoning up to attempt a syncmirror migration then... i had done this from one era VMAX 40K to a later 450AF and&amp;nbsp; it worked fine ... i appreciated that i couldn't find any reference to any NetApp backend other than E-series , but perhaps naively&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;thinking that i could make up sets of same sized LUNS on the 8200, zone them against the V-series initiators and syncmirror from VMAX to 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wishful&amp;nbsp; thinking perhaps ....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;john&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 15:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HYPERHYPO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-15T15:18:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>v-series / FAS8200 interoperability</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140069#M8807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have an&amp;nbsp; interop question i'm not getting to bottom of via the matrix tool.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It involves a V-series migration&amp;nbsp; (V3240/3270s) curently using&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;EMC VMAX&amp;nbsp; as backend FC LUN providers, in a mixed SAN&amp;nbsp; that includes&amp;nbsp; a general&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;mix of AIX, ESX and MS hosts , Brocade&amp;nbsp; DCX and 5300 switches,&amp;nbsp; including&amp;nbsp; virtual requirements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Connectivity on replacement NetApp 8200 is FC biased on boards 1 and 2 and onboard..to allow&amp;nbsp; for connections to multiple san circuits ,&amp;nbsp; different host&amp;nbsp; types.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So very limited onboard&amp;nbsp; IP connectivity.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hence need to retain V-series function ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, question is , will V-series work with 8200 backend to continue to provide CIFS / NFS access.?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I could only find implication that NetApp E-series backends suitable via the&amp;nbsp; Matrix Tool...hope that's not the&amp;nbsp; case..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140069#M8807</guid>
      <dc:creator>HYPERHYPO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:44:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: v-series / FAS8200 interoperability</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140070#M8808</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The 8200 cannot sit&amp;nbsp;behind the V3200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ONTAP actually has hardcoded panic excpetion that prevents it. it detects it as target-intiatior loop (i tried to do it once in a lab with ONTAP 8.1 or 8.2 7-mode).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=311121&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;https://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=311121&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt; - the panic string&amp;nbsp;likely&amp;nbsp;correlate to that bug. i don't have it in hand to cross check.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;just to clarify (as it might not be ovieues) you know that you are allowed to&amp;nbsp;attached shelf to the V-series directly. right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;G&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 15:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140070#M8808</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T15:32:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: v-series / FAS8200 interoperability</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140071#M8809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;actually&amp;nbsp;re-reading the bug&amp;nbsp;description is not that exact one. but trust-me it will still cause a panic :-).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;they&amp;nbsp;might changed it in Cdot to have forginlun import working. but even if so. it will still be unsupported as a V-series backend&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 15:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140071#M8809</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T15:37:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: v-series / FAS8200 interoperability</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140232#M8817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks G for your input&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes its a 7mode 8.2.3P6 V3240/V3270 against ( i believe) cmode 9.3 on the 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your asked about attaching&amp;nbsp; shelves to existing V-series ...our client has bought an 8200 to act as a target for a mixed bag which includes the V-series hosts ...so only available shelves ..5 of them..are on the 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So not even worth zoning up to attempt a syncmirror migration then... i had done this from one era VMAX 40K to a later 450AF and&amp;nbsp; it worked fine ... i appreciated that i couldn't find any reference to any NetApp backend other than E-series , but perhaps naively&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;thinking that i could make up sets of same sized LUNS on the 8200, zone them against the V-series initiators and syncmirror from VMAX to 8200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wishful&amp;nbsp; thinking perhaps ....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;john&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 15:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/v-series-FAS8200-interoperability/m-p/140232#M8817</guid>
      <dc:creator>HYPERHYPO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-15T15:18:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

