<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: adding new disk shelf to existing aggregate - check my steps in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147593#M9391</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The only remaining question is regarding my raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was initially planning on adding 2 disks to the existing 18+2 raid group to make it a 22 disk raid group and then add the additional 22 disks to the aggregate as a second 20+2 raid group. This would leave me with a 44 disk aggregate consisting of two 22+2 raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My concern is by adding those 2 disks to the existing 18+2 rg, will that create an imbalance/hot disks? Would it be just as good to leave the 18+2 rg alone and simply add a new 22+2 rg to the aggregate?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will be running reallocation jobs on all the volumes after.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>theizer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-01T14:29:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>adding new disk shelf to existing aggregate - check my steps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147513#M9378</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a FAS8040 (Clustered DataOntap 9.1) that currently has the following configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;aggr1_01 - 20 disks (18+2 raid dp) - node1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;aggr1_02 - 44 disks (two 22 disk raid groups (20+2 raid dp) - node2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am adding a new shelf of 24 disks with the intention of adding all 24 disks to aggr1_01 to address performance and capacity issues.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you please look over my steps below and let me know if I am missing anything or simply confirm what I am doing is correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Increase the maxraidsize for aggr1_01 from 20 to 22
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage aggregate modify aggregate aggr1_01 -maxraidsize 22&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Disable disk auto assign
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage disk option modify -autoassign off&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;rack, stack, set shelf id, cable new shelf
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;confirm cabling with config advisor&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Assign new unassigned disks to node1
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage disk assign -disk all -node node1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;add 2 of the new disks to the existing raid group in aggr1_01
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate aggr1_01 -raidgroup rg0 -diskcount 2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;add 22 of the new disks to aggr1_01 as a new raid group
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate aggr1_01 -raidgroup new -diskcount 22&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;OR&lt;/STRONG&gt; issue this command instead of the above two commands:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate aggr1_01 -raidgroup all -diskcount 24&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;(either way should end up with two 22 (20+2 raid dp) raid groups in aggr1_01, right?)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At this point I should have successfully added 24 new disks to aggr1_01 and it should consist of two 22 disk raid groups, just like the other aggregate aggr1_02.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In order to take advantage of the additional spindle count, do I need to reallocate all the volumes on aggr1_01??&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What am I missing or not considering?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147513#M9378</guid>
      <dc:creator>theizer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding new disk shelf to existing aggregate - check my steps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147591#M9390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks good. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you good? &amp;nbsp;I saw the same post on reddit. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147591#M9390</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T14:12:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding new disk shelf to existing aggregate - check my steps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147593#M9391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only remaining question is regarding my raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was initially planning on adding 2 disks to the existing 18+2 raid group to make it a 22 disk raid group and then add the additional 22 disks to the aggregate as a second 20+2 raid group. This would leave me with a 44 disk aggregate consisting of two 22+2 raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My concern is by adding those 2 disks to the existing 18+2 rg, will that create an imbalance/hot disks? Would it be just as good to leave the 18+2 rg alone and simply add a new 22+2 rg to the aggregate?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will be running reallocation jobs on all the volumes after.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147593#M9391</guid>
      <dc:creator>theizer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T14:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding new disk shelf to existing aggregate - check my steps</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147598#M9392</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Match your RG as best as possible. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; a difference of 1 or 2 disks rarely makes a notable difference, &amp;nbsp;but anything more than that I would adjust to they are close to the same, if not the same. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have enough spares, &amp;nbsp;I would create 2x 22 disk RGs. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Any "hotspots" &amp;nbsp;should be taken care of after the reallocate is done. &amp;nbsp; It will move the blocks over any new disks added. &amp;nbsp; Even if you don't run the reallocate, &amp;nbsp;WAFL will eventually use the new disks for writing date. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;the reallocate just speeds up the re-distribution&amp;nbsp;of blocks to new disks in the aggr.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/adding-new-disk-shelf-to-existing-aggregate-check-my-steps/m-p/147598#M9392</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T15:42:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

