<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Flash Memory Degredation in AFF</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/Flash-Memory-Degredation/m-p/95073#M121</link>
    <description>Also, how about using filesystems with snapshotting? Or using this storage for fast cache? Are these too write intensive for flash storage?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dws</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-29T18:14:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flash Memory Degredation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/Flash-Memory-Degredation/m-p/95065#M119</link>
      <description>Does using flash storage in a situation with a lot of writes degrade the storage? Is the product more failure prone than traditional spinning disk for high write situations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/Flash-Memory-Degredation/m-p/95065#M119</guid>
      <dc:creator>dws</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flash Memory Degredation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/Flash-Memory-Degredation/m-p/95073#M121</link>
      <description>Also, how about using filesystems with snapshotting? Or using this storage for fast cache? Are these too write intensive for flash storage?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/Flash-Memory-Degredation/m-p/95073#M121</guid>
      <dc:creator>dws</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-29T18:14:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

