<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: what the difreent between RAID configration in AFF</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452861#M1269</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;But the possibility of failure of the SSD in case A HIGHT compare with B&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I went to compaer which is best for me one aggregate (2 RG's) or two aggregates (1 RG per aggr)?and why&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 16:11:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AhmedAl-Batoosh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-22T16:11:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>what the difreent between RAID configration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452858#M1267</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what is the best RAID configration below and why&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;"A"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAID type: RAID-DP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Drive model: 15300 GB SSD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total number of drives: 26&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of hot spares: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAFL overhead (%): 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate snapshot reserve (%):5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Volume snapshot reserve (%):10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total number of drives per aggr: 25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of data drives per aggr.: 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of RAID groups per aggr.: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;space usable 255.6 TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"B"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AID type: RAID-DP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Drive model: 15300 GB SSD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total number of drives: 26 (13 per RAID)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Number of hot spares per raid: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAFL overhead (%): 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate snapshot reserve (%):5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Volume snapshot reserve (%):10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total number of drives per aggr: 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of data drives per aggr.: 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of RAID groups per aggr.: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;space usable 116.2 TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452858#M1267</guid>
      <dc:creator>AhmedAl-Batoosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what the difreent between RAID configration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452860#M1268</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not following config "B".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have one aggregate (2 RG's) or two aggregates (1 RG per aggr)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 14:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452860#M1268</guid>
      <dc:creator>andris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-22T14:44:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what the difreent between RAID configration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452861#M1269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;But the possibility of failure of the SSD in case A HIGHT compare with B&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I went to compaer which is best for me one aggregate (2 RG's) or two aggregates (1 RG per aggr)?and why&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 16:11:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/what-the-difreent-between-RAID-configration/m-p/452861#M1269</guid>
      <dc:creator>AhmedAl-Batoosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-22T16:11:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

