<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS in AFF</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115037#M235</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 1 shelf SSD X24. planning on creating 2 flash pools for 1 agg on each node within a pair, RAID-DP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Should I do: 9 data, 2 dp, 1 spare, or 8 data, 2dp, 2 spares for each pool? can data disks be odd number?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, among 24 SSDs, 7 is owned by one node, 17 is owned by the other. Should I split the ownership by half and half before creating the pool or does that matter?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 22:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T22:14:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115037#M235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 1 shelf SSD X24. planning on creating 2 flash pools for 1 agg on each node within a pair, RAID-DP&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Should I do: 9 data, 2 dp, 1 spare, or 8 data, 2dp, 2 spares for each pool? can data disks be odd number?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, among 24 SSDs, 7 is owned by one node, 17 is owned by the other. Should I split the ownership by half and half before creating the pool or does that matter?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 22:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115037#M235</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T22:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115058#M236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have to split the ownership if you want 12 disks used for each node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can have an odd number of disks in a raid group, that's no problem. Whether you have 1 or 2 spares is a personal choice. One spare would give you more usable capacity. If you know you could get a replacement disk quickly - then 1 spare should be fine. If it might take awhile to get a replacement on site, you may want to have more than 1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115058#M236</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwelshman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-26T22:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115157#M238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A follow-up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When one failed, can SSD spare on the other node&amp;nbsp;substitue&amp;nbsp;the failed one?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 20:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115157#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T20:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115161#M239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, if you &amp;nbsp;run on DataONTAP 8.3 you can look at storage pool technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1636022/html/GUID-8284CB30-5BC5-4D10-B0AA-AA8F8DAA752E.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1636022/html/GUID-8284CB30-5BC5-4D10-B0AA-AA8F8DAA752E.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:49:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115161#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikkisse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T15:49:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115191#M240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could somebody please let me know if a disk failed on one node, and a spare disk on the other node could be selected for rebuilt? both nodes in the same HA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115191#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-29T10:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115194#M241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a disk to be used as a hot spare for another disk, it must conform to the following criteria:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;• It must be either an exact match for the disk it is replacing or an appropriate alternative.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;• If SyncMirror is in use, the spare must be in the same pool as the disk it is replacing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;• The spare must be owned by the same system as the disk it is replacing.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115194#M241</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikkisse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-29T11:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115373#M242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is your suggestion to use either Storage Pool or Dedicated SSD aggr for Flash Pool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/115373#M242</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-09T01:34:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SIZING 24 SSDs for 2 FLASH POOLS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/116389#M247</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would split the shelf - odd #'s to one controller and even #'s to the other controller. &amp;nbsp;Since the SSDs are so expensive, we chose to go with #disks+2DP with 1 spare. &amp;nbsp;The rebuild times are extremely fast on the SSD raidgroup. &amp;nbsp;You would essentially have to lose 3 disks within 4 hours if you only have 4 hour support. &amp;nbsp;Never had a SSD fail in my experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:55:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SIZING-24-SSDs-for-2-FLASH-POOLS/m-p/116389#M247</guid>
      <dc:creator>J-L-B</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-27T01:55:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

