<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VMWare ESXi 5.5 on AFF in AFF</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131286#M333</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You mentioned your current pain points on your spinning disk based system being "disk activity always &amp;gt;95%, b2b CPs, and de-dupe running 24/7".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;99% of the time the AFF will definitely resolve this. An AFF is flash optimised, it bypasses layers in the&amp;nbsp;RAID system to drastically improve latency/speed when writing to disk. When you add the fast IOP/low latency performance of flash, you should see an eliminaction in b2b CPs. Also take note that flash is more resiliant to a "full file system" than spinning disk. As your available capacity reduces the system doesn't need to keep seeking the disk subsystem for free space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFF also introduces inline-dedupe (at an aggregate level if you get on to 9.2), which will exponentially improve your post-dedupe performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Overall, moving to an AFF *should* be a good move for you. But definitely get advice from your SE/partner that is specific to your environment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 02:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonathon_lanzon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-24T02:44:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VMWare ESXi 5.5 on AFF</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131255#M331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm in the process of replacing current FAS6280 controllers with AFF. These are used for a large VSI environment hosting over 2000 VMs and I am currently struggling with disk activity always &amp;gt;95%, b2b CPs, and de-dupe running 24/7 due to the amount of FC LUNs I am hosting (~250).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any perfermance results of VMWare on AFF in a similar environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 07:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131255#M331</guid>
      <dc:creator>UberKV</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-23T07:39:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMWare ESXi 5.5 on AFF</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131282#M332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You didn't mention which exact AFF model you're getting...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on your description of your performance bottlenecks a new AFF system should mitigate those bottlenecks, nicely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would request some performance modeling estimates for your new AFF system from your NetApp sales rep.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 23:46:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131282#M332</guid>
      <dc:creator>andris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-23T23:46:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMWare ESXi 5.5 on AFF</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131286#M333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You mentioned your current pain points on your spinning disk based system being "disk activity always &amp;gt;95%, b2b CPs, and de-dupe running 24/7".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;99% of the time the AFF will definitely resolve this. An AFF is flash optimised, it bypasses layers in the&amp;nbsp;RAID system to drastically improve latency/speed when writing to disk. When you add the fast IOP/low latency performance of flash, you should see an eliminaction in b2b CPs. Also take note that flash is more resiliant to a "full file system" than spinning disk. As your available capacity reduces the system doesn't need to keep seeking the disk subsystem for free space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFF also introduces inline-dedupe (at an aggregate level if you get on to 9.2), which will exponentially improve your post-dedupe performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Overall, moving to an AFF *should* be a good move for you. But definitely get advice from your SE/partner that is specific to your environment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 02:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/VMWare-ESXi-5-5-on-AFF/m-p/131286#M333</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathon_lanzon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-24T02:44:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

