<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SED Drives drive-protection-enabled flag reporting incorrectly in AFF</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166115#M957</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When we run 'storage encryption disk show' the disk has its non-default&amp;nbsp;data-key-id and is in mode 'data', as such we know the disk itself is encrypted fine, as the root aggregate also shows&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;drive-protection-enabled as true. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It very much matches the output issue as per that BURT, ideally it needs tagging&amp;nbsp;for 9.8P2 as well as it effects us on that version&amp;nbsp;as well as the ones currently listed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amayacitta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-20T08:29:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SED Drives drive-protection-enabled flag reporting incorrectly</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166086#M955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did anyone else notice this also applying to 9.8P2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://mysupport.netapp.com/site/bugs-online/product/ONTAP/BURT/1385348" target="_blank"&gt;https://mysupport.netapp.com/site/bugs-online/product/ONTAP/BURT/1385348&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I run "storage aggregate show -aggregate * -fields encrypt-with-aggr-key,drive-protection-enabled" it lists the root aggregate for the SED disks as true for&amp;nbsp;drive-protection-enabled and the data aggregates as false. Got myself in a pickle trying to work it out, then found the above bug. It could do with being tagged for 9.8P2 as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166086#M955</guid>
      <dc:creator>amayacitta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SED Drives drive-protection-enabled flag reporting incorrectly</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166111#M956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you check the "storage encryption disk show -container-id &amp;lt;ID&amp;gt;" do you get the correct response from this output?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166111#M956</guid>
      <dc:creator>aladd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T06:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SED Drives drive-protection-enabled flag reporting incorrectly</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166115#M957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When we run 'storage encryption disk show' the disk has its non-default&amp;nbsp;data-key-id and is in mode 'data', as such we know the disk itself is encrypted fine, as the root aggregate also shows&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;drive-protection-enabled as true. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It very much matches the output issue as per that BURT, ideally it needs tagging&amp;nbsp;for 9.8P2 as well as it effects us on that version&amp;nbsp;as well as the ones currently listed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166115#M957</guid>
      <dc:creator>amayacitta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T08:29:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SED Drives drive-protection-enabled flag reporting incorrectly</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166116#M958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would suggest registering a case so that it can be tracked, as the bug is relatively new.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/AFF/SED-Drives-drive-protection-enabled-flag-reporting-incorrectly/m-p/166116#M958</guid>
      <dc:creator>aladd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T08:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

