<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests in Microsoft Virtualization Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31897#M1470</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been&amp;nbsp; doing some testing with&amp;nbsp; our 4 node Windows 2008 R2&amp;nbsp; Hyper-V cluster&amp;nbsp; and SnapManager for Hyper-V.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have some test Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 guests some with and some with out pass though LUNS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last week&amp;nbsp; we had finally applied all the relivant hot fixes as per NetApp Hyper-V best practice and NetApp Technical support, and were able to get 100% sucessful jobs SMHV jobs of both types of guests with and without pass through LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To continue&amp;nbsp; testing our&amp;nbsp; IT manager&amp;nbsp; did a live migration to move the guests&amp;nbsp; around&amp;nbsp; on the cluster, as you would if you were going to take some hosts off line&amp;nbsp; for maintanence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our SMHV jobs started failing with the following VSS&amp;nbsp; errors&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="color: #0000ff; "&gt;Backup failed with VSS Retryable error.&lt;BR /&gt;(9)] Writer Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer involved in backup or restore encountered a retryable error. Writer returned failure code 0x800423f3. Writer state is 5.&lt;BR /&gt;For more information, look at the Hyper-V-VMMS event log in the Windows Event Viewer under "Applications and Services Logs-&amp;gt;Microsoft-&amp;gt;Windows".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas on what&amp;nbsp; we have missed&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were expecteing that&amp;nbsp; SMHV&amp;nbsp; would not be affected&amp;nbsp; by&amp;nbsp; live migrations ??????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:09:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rdenyer001</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:09:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31897#M1470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been&amp;nbsp; doing some testing with&amp;nbsp; our 4 node Windows 2008 R2&amp;nbsp; Hyper-V cluster&amp;nbsp; and SnapManager for Hyper-V.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have some test Windows 2003 and Windows 2008 guests some with and some with out pass though LUNS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last week&amp;nbsp; we had finally applied all the relivant hot fixes as per NetApp Hyper-V best practice and NetApp Technical support, and were able to get 100% sucessful jobs SMHV jobs of both types of guests with and without pass through LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To continue&amp;nbsp; testing our&amp;nbsp; IT manager&amp;nbsp; did a live migration to move the guests&amp;nbsp; around&amp;nbsp; on the cluster, as you would if you were going to take some hosts off line&amp;nbsp; for maintanence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our SMHV jobs started failing with the following VSS&amp;nbsp; errors&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="color: #0000ff; "&gt;Backup failed with VSS Retryable error.&lt;BR /&gt;(9)] Writer Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer involved in backup or restore encountered a retryable error. Writer returned failure code 0x800423f3. Writer state is 5.&lt;BR /&gt;For more information, look at the Hyper-V-VMMS event log in the Windows Event Viewer under "Applications and Services Logs-&amp;gt;Microsoft-&amp;gt;Windows".&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas on what&amp;nbsp; we have missed&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were expecteing that&amp;nbsp; SMHV&amp;nbsp; would not be affected&amp;nbsp; by&amp;nbsp; live migrations ??????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:09:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31897#M1470</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdenyer001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:09:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31902#M1471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further update&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After a day of&amp;nbsp; un-installing and checking all configuration options for SnapManaager for Hyper-V and SnapDrive&amp;nbsp; we have found that its is only the&amp;nbsp; VMs with pass through LUNs that fail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31902#M1471</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdenyer001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T21:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31907#M1472</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same issues with live migration and the server doesnt have Pass through disks ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have lots of Virtual machine that failed .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Backup task failed to succeed. Error: Vss Requestor - Backup Components failed.Writer Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer involved in backup or restore encountered a retryable error. Writer returned failure code 0x800423f3. Writer state is 5.&lt;BR /&gt;For more information, look at the Hyper-V-VMMS event log in the Windows Event Viewer under "Applications and Services Logs-&amp;gt;Microsoft-&amp;gt;Windows".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Idea ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW do you have the all list of the Hotfixes that install ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ophir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31907#M1472</guid>
      <dc:creator>ophir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-09T11:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31912#M1474</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Needed to make sure&amp;nbsp; that Hotfixes were installed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In particular&amp;nbsp; we needed to take this in to account&amp;nbsp; as a lot of our guests VMs had pass through LUNs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Arial; "&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Virtual machine backups taking too long to complete&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If a virtual machine contains several direct-attached iSCSI LUNs or pass-through LUNs, and SnapDrive&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;for Windows is installed on the virtual machine, the virtual machine backup can take a long time.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Hyper-V writer takes a hardware snapshot of all the LUNs in the virtual machine using the SnapDrive&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;for Windows VSS hardware provider. There is a Microsoft hot &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;fi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;x that uses the default system provider&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; font-size: 2; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(software provider) in the virtual machine to make the snapshot. As a result, the Data ONTAP VSS&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;hardware provider is not used for snapshot creation inside the child OS and the backup speed increases.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;For more information on the Microsoft hot&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;fi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;x, see Knowledge Base article 975354 on the Microsoft&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;support site.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: Arial; "&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Related information&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM style=": ; color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times New Roman; "&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Knowledge Base article 975354 - &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 2; "&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is from the SMHV release notes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;Richard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31912#M1474</guid>
      <dc:creator>rdenyer001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T22:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMHV jobs fail after live migration of Guests</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31917#M1476</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've the same issue with a customer running SMHV on a Win2008R2 SP1 machine. SP1 does contain the KB Artikel 975354 Hotfix and the VSSAPI.DLL has a higher version number than in the article.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You know anything about the issue with the hotfix installed? We've a SQL Server running with iSCSI Guest connections. Is the registry hack with setting VSSRequestor necessary to get such a situation running?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BG Christoph&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/SMHV-jobs-fail-after-live-migration-of-Guests/m-p/31917#M1476</guid>
      <dc:creator>christoph</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-12T10:43:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

