<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Support for additional lun types with new-NaLun cmdlet ? in Microsoft Virtualization Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52878#M2485</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;mmm, too fast with the question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;used -type hyper_v and windows_gpt and it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nevermind &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>danaher_gs3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-20T12:37:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support for additional lun types with new-NaLun cmdlet ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52873#M2484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, when looking at the new-NaLun documentation I don't see support for all the current available lun types (e.g. windows_gpt or hyper-v) is that something that will be added or can be handled (through PoSh) in another way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52873#M2484</guid>
      <dc:creator>danaher_gs3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support for additional lun types with new-NaLun cmdlet ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52878#M2485</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;mmm, too fast with the question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;used -type hyper_v and windows_gpt and it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nevermind &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52878#M2485</guid>
      <dc:creator>danaher_gs3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-20T12:37:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Support for additional lun types with new-NaLun cmdlet ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52883#M2486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad it worked, Eric.&amp;nbsp; It generally doesn't hurt to try something.&amp;nbsp; I made a conscious choice when writing the Toolkit to avoid enumerated types for cmdlet arguments in favor of strings.&amp;nbsp; Enums offer type safety, but then the Toolkit would have to change anytime Data ONTAP adds a new type value.&amp;nbsp; I'll add the additional LUN types to the docs for the next release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Support-for-additional-lun-types-with-new-NaLun-cmdlet/m-p/52883#M2486</guid>
      <dc:creator>cknight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-20T21:21:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

