<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Questions regarding configuration of mirroring and SNAP Mirror over a Metro Ethernet. in Microsoft Virtualization Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Questions-regarding-configuration-of-mirroring-and-SNAP-Mirror-over-a-Metro/m-p/78282#M3834</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking at moving a customer to a new data center.&amp;nbsp; In the process we are going to retain their current NetApp storage for both locations.&amp;nbsp; I ask that you forgive me as I don't know models etc. really.&amp;nbsp; First of all, the "intended" design was to have a dual controller NetApp FAS2040 (I think) connected to a storage chassis with several 15k SAS drives.&amp;nbsp; There are two volumes at 2 TB each.&amp;nbsp; The idea was to have the storage being served up to XenServer by either controller and for the two 2 TB volumes to mirror each other.&amp;nbsp; Additionally, there is a third FAS2040 with SATA drives that was intended to be a SNAP mirror.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In actuality each controller is serving a 2 TB volume to XenServer and the SNAP mirror is broken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I would like to do, is fix the mirror.&amp;nbsp; So we have two 2 TB volumes mirroring each other and being served as one 2 TB volume by either controller.&amp;nbsp; These will reside at a co-location with our XenServers.&amp;nbsp; Then use the corporate offices as a DR location.&amp;nbsp; Here I will have the SATA unit acting as a SNAP mirror with a couple more XenServers.&amp;nbsp; In this case, if there were a disaster at the colo we could spin up the VMs at the DR site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it doable with NetApp what I am asking in terms of mirroring two 2 TB volumes into one volume presented to the hypervisor?&amp;nbsp; Can the volume be served by two controllers?&amp;nbsp; And can SNAP Mirror run over a Metro-Ethernet connection of 100Mbps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LEWIS_TIMOTHYE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:41:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Questions regarding configuration of mirroring and SNAP Mirror over a Metro Ethernet.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Questions-regarding-configuration-of-mirroring-and-SNAP-Mirror-over-a-Metro/m-p/78282#M3834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking at moving a customer to a new data center.&amp;nbsp; In the process we are going to retain their current NetApp storage for both locations.&amp;nbsp; I ask that you forgive me as I don't know models etc. really.&amp;nbsp; First of all, the "intended" design was to have a dual controller NetApp FAS2040 (I think) connected to a storage chassis with several 15k SAS drives.&amp;nbsp; There are two volumes at 2 TB each.&amp;nbsp; The idea was to have the storage being served up to XenServer by either controller and for the two 2 TB volumes to mirror each other.&amp;nbsp; Additionally, there is a third FAS2040 with SATA drives that was intended to be a SNAP mirror.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In actuality each controller is serving a 2 TB volume to XenServer and the SNAP mirror is broken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I would like to do, is fix the mirror.&amp;nbsp; So we have two 2 TB volumes mirroring each other and being served as one 2 TB volume by either controller.&amp;nbsp; These will reside at a co-location with our XenServers.&amp;nbsp; Then use the corporate offices as a DR location.&amp;nbsp; Here I will have the SATA unit acting as a SNAP mirror with a couple more XenServers.&amp;nbsp; In this case, if there were a disaster at the colo we could spin up the VMs at the DR site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it doable with NetApp what I am asking in terms of mirroring two 2 TB volumes into one volume presented to the hypervisor?&amp;nbsp; Can the volume be served by two controllers?&amp;nbsp; And can SNAP Mirror run over a Metro-Ethernet connection of 100Mbps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Questions-regarding-configuration-of-mirroring-and-SNAP-Mirror-over-a-Metro/m-p/78282#M3834</guid>
      <dc:creator>LEWIS_TIMOTHYE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Questions regarding configuration of mirroring and SNAP Mirror over a Metro Ethernet.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Questions-regarding-configuration-of-mirroring-and-SNAP-Mirror-over-a-Metro/m-p/78287#M3835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Questions-regarding-configuration-of-mirroring-and-SNAP-Mirror-over-a-Metro/m-p/78287#M3835</guid>
      <dc:creator>LEWIS_TIMOTHYE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T14:59:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

