<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Shared VHDX for Guest Clusters using SMB 3.0 in Microsoft Virtualization Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/113627#M4615</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unforunately I never got it to work. I believe it's only supported using Microsoft's native SMB 3.0 -- never got it going with our NetApp filers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LiveAverage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-11T16:14:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shared VHDX for Guest Clusters using SMB 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/102755#M4222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just curious if there's any word of supporting Shared VHDX's for guest clusters when running SMB 3.0 as backend storage for Hyper-V clusters? Has anyone else hit this roadblock? SMB3 is great for general VM storage, but there still needs to be&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;some&lt;/EM&gt; way, preferably with non-block storage, to create shared guest storage for satisfying guest cluster needs? Any information on what others are doing would be helpful. Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;JR&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/102755#M4222</guid>
      <dc:creator>LiveAverage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-03T19:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shared VHDX for Guest Clusters using SMB 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/113625#M4614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you figure it out?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I understand you need SMB3.02 support, but maybe that´s changed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/113625#M4614</guid>
      <dc:creator>connoisseur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-11T15:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shared VHDX for Guest Clusters using SMB 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/113627#M4615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unforunately I never got it to work. I believe it's only supported using Microsoft's native SMB 3.0 -- never got it going with our NetApp filers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Shared-VHDX-for-Guest-Clusters-using-SMB-3-0/m-p/113627#M4615</guid>
      <dc:creator>LiveAverage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-11T16:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

