https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Headroom-stats-with-Powershell/m-p/138413#M5640 <P>Hi -</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Has anyone tried pulling&nbsp;aggregate&nbsp;<SPAN>performance capacity numbers (headroom) via powershell successfully?&nbsp; I'm noticing an issue&nbsp;when pulling SSD based aggregates (on an AFF8080 for example) vs spindle based aggrs (FAS8080).&nbsp; The numbers returned for SAS based aggrs seem fine, but SSD seem completely off.&nbsp; </SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P><SPAN>Toolkit version: 4.5</SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>DOTP version: 9.1 &amp; 9.2P1 </SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>PS version: 5.1 (tried older versions as well)</SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P><SPAN>Thanks,</SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>-Bill</SPAN></P> Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:59:29 GMT 1BillK 2025-06-04T13:59:29Z https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Headroom-stats-with-Powershell/m-p/138413#M5640 <P>Hi -</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>Has anyone tried pulling&nbsp;aggregate&nbsp;<SPAN>performance capacity numbers (headroom) via powershell successfully?&nbsp; I'm noticing an issue&nbsp;when pulling SSD based aggregates (on an AFF8080 for example) vs spindle based aggrs (FAS8080).&nbsp; The numbers returned for SAS based aggrs seem fine, but SSD seem completely off.&nbsp; </SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P><SPAN>Toolkit version: 4.5</SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>DOTP version: 9.1 &amp; 9.2P1 </SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>PS version: 5.1 (tried older versions as well)</SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P><SPAN>Thanks,</SPAN></P> <P><SPAN>-Bill</SPAN></P> Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:59:29 GMT https://community.netapp.com/t5/Microsoft-Virtualization-Discussions/Headroom-stats-with-Powershell/m-p/138413#M5640 1BillK 2025-06-04T13:59:29Z