<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460106#M10170</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have used robocopy for CIFS data migration from old ONTAP (9.1P2) to new (9.11.1P7). After initial copy and incremental, I see the volume on the new system is taking almost 3.5 TB of extra space. Also the number of files in source volume is more than that in destination volume. There are no errors in robocopy and the summary shown everything copied. I have done random checks on folders on both sides they look good.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is really strange!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE USAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;source::&amp;gt; vol show-space cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vserver : source_cifs&lt;BR /&gt;Volume : cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feature Used Used%&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------- ---------- ------&lt;BR /&gt;User Data &lt;STRONG&gt;4.24TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; 28%&lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem Metadata 5.68GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Inodes 2.05GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Reserve 768GB 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Deduplication 34.97GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Spill 350.4GB 2%&lt;BR /&gt;Performance Metadata 580.3MB 0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Used 5.37TB 36%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Physical Used 5.19TB 35%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;source::&amp;gt; vol show -vserver source_cifs -volume cifs_data -fields files&lt;BR /&gt;vserver volume files&lt;BR /&gt;-------- --------- --------&lt;BR /&gt;source_cifs cifs_data &lt;STRONG&gt;31876696&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;------------------------------------------------- DESTINATION USAGE ----------------------------------------&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dest::&amp;gt; vol show-space -volume cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vserver : dest-cifs&lt;BR /&gt;Volume : cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feature Used Used%&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------- ---------- ------&lt;BR /&gt;User Data &lt;STRONG&gt;7.63TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; 51%&lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem Metadata 3.01GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Inodes 1.50GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Reserve 768GB 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Performance Metadata 42.77GB 0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Used 8.42TB 56%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Physical Used 8.23TB 55%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;dest::&amp;gt; vol show -vserver dest-cifs -volume cifs_data -fields files&lt;BR /&gt;vserver volume files&lt;BR /&gt;--------------- --------- --------&lt;BR /&gt;dest-cifs cifs_data &lt;STRONG&gt;21251126&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------------- ROBOCOPY command used --------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;robocopy /e /mir /copyall /r:0 /w:0 /ETA /mt:32 /sec /secfix /dcopy:t&amp;nbsp; \\source_cifs\cifs_data$\ \\dest_cifs\cifs_data$\&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is storage showing wrong usage ? or is there any bug or issue with this ?&lt;BR /&gt;Any help is appreciated. Thanks!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kalki1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-12T16:41:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460106#M10170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have used robocopy for CIFS data migration from old ONTAP (9.1P2) to new (9.11.1P7). After initial copy and incremental, I see the volume on the new system is taking almost 3.5 TB of extra space. Also the number of files in source volume is more than that in destination volume. There are no errors in robocopy and the summary shown everything copied. I have done random checks on folders on both sides they look good.&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;This is really strange!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE USAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;source::&amp;gt; vol show-space cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vserver : source_cifs&lt;BR /&gt;Volume : cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feature Used Used%&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------- ---------- ------&lt;BR /&gt;User Data &lt;STRONG&gt;4.24TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; 28%&lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem Metadata 5.68GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Inodes 2.05GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Reserve 768GB 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Deduplication 34.97GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Spill 350.4GB 2%&lt;BR /&gt;Performance Metadata 580.3MB 0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Used 5.37TB 36%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Physical Used 5.19TB 35%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;source::&amp;gt; vol show -vserver source_cifs -volume cifs_data -fields files&lt;BR /&gt;vserver volume files&lt;BR /&gt;-------- --------- --------&lt;BR /&gt;source_cifs cifs_data &lt;STRONG&gt;31876696&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;------------------------------------------------- DESTINATION USAGE ----------------------------------------&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dest::&amp;gt; vol show-space -volume cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vserver : dest-cifs&lt;BR /&gt;Volume : cifs_data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feature Used Used%&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------- ---------- ------&lt;BR /&gt;User Data &lt;STRONG&gt;7.63TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; 51%&lt;BR /&gt;Filesystem Metadata 3.01GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Inodes 1.50GB 0%&lt;BR /&gt;Snapshot Reserve 768GB 5%&lt;BR /&gt;Performance Metadata 42.77GB 0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Used 8.42TB 56%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total Physical Used 8.23TB 55%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;dest::&amp;gt; vol show -vserver dest-cifs -volume cifs_data -fields files&lt;BR /&gt;vserver volume files&lt;BR /&gt;--------------- --------- --------&lt;BR /&gt;dest-cifs cifs_data &lt;STRONG&gt;21251126&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------------------- ROBOCOPY command used --------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;robocopy /e /mir /copyall /r:0 /w:0 /ETA /mt:32 /sec /secfix /dcopy:t&amp;nbsp; \\source_cifs\cifs_data$\ \\dest_cifs\cifs_data$\&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is storage showing wrong usage ? or is there any bug or issue with this ?&lt;BR /&gt;Any help is appreciated. Thanks!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460106#M10170</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalki1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-12T16:41:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460107#M10171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If copying/migration from NetApp to NetApp I have always used snapmirror, it is quick as it utilizes inter-cluster network.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 04:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460107#M10171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanaman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-14T04:48:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460108#M10172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;snapmirror cannot be done as the ONTAP versions are not compatible and the source storage is old enough that it cannot be upgraded from 9.1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 05:08:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460108#M10172</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalki1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-14T05:08:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460130#M10173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, didn't know source OnTap is that old. Have you tried XCP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;NetApp XCP Overview&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NetApp XCP&lt;/STRONG&gt; is a client-based software tool designed for &lt;STRONG&gt;fast and reliable data migrations&lt;/STRONG&gt; to and from NetApp systems, as well as for file analytics. It supports both &lt;STRONG&gt;any-to-NetApp&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;NetApp-to-NetApp&lt;/STRONG&gt; migrations, making it versatile for various data management needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Key Features&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;High-Performance Migrations&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Utilizes parallel streams of asynchronous I/O requests to significantly speed up the transfer of large volumes of files, even in the millions or billions.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;File Analytics&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Provides insights into file systems by scanning file shares and analyzing data, applicable to both NetApp and non-NetApp systems.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Customizable Reporting&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Generates detailed reports in various formats (CSV, HTML, plain text) based on file attributes like access time, owner, and size.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Incremental Updates&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Supports syncing for incremental updates to ensure data consistency.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460130#M10173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanaman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-15T05:02:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data inconsistency in using robocopy for CIFS migration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460136#M10174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am aware about XCP. we chose robocopy for this migration. Unless, we know for sure the discrepancy is because of the migration tool, we do not want to change it yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:12:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Data-inconsistency-in-using-robocopy-for-CIFS-migration/m-p/460136#M10174</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalki1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-15T13:12:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

