<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NFS mount options for NFS shares. in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-mount-options-for-NFS-shares/m-p/466658#M10234</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm reviewing our current NFS client mount configuration and would like guidance on recommended NetApp NFS mount options for RHEL 9 clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is what we have for our nfsv3 shares:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;aplnas123:/nas123_vol013 /xxxx nfs auto,rw,defaults,intr 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And this is what we have for our nfsv4 shares:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;aplnas123:/nas123_vol013 /xxxx nfs4 rw,nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Should the NFS version (for example, vers=3, vers=4.1, or vers=4.2) be explicitly specified on RHEL 9 clients?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone know whether these options are appropriate for RHEL 9 clients? If not, what would you recommend changing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is that the "right" options may vary depending on business, performance, and application requirements, but I would appreciate any Linux or NetApp guidance to validate or tune the current setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joedpalma9</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-07T12:48:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NFS mount options for NFS shares.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-mount-options-for-NFS-shares/m-p/466658#M10234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm reviewing our current NFS client mount configuration and would like guidance on recommended NetApp NFS mount options for RHEL 9 clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is what we have for our nfsv3 shares:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;aplnas123:/nas123_vol013 /xxxx nfs auto,rw,defaults,intr 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And this is what we have for our nfsv4 shares:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;aplnas123:/nas123_vol013 /xxxx nfs4 rw,nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Should the NFS version (for example, vers=3, vers=4.1, or vers=4.2) be explicitly specified on RHEL 9 clients?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone know whether these options are appropriate for RHEL 9 clients? If not, what would you recommend changing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is that the "right" options may vary depending on business, performance, and application requirements, but I would appreciate any Linux or NetApp guidance to validate or tune the current setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-mount-options-for-NFS-shares/m-p/466658#M10234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joedpalma9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-07T12:48:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

