<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Copying volumes to tape in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14230#M1317</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;*lol* ... I did this for a customer once... from a FAS250 with a hacked HSSDC to fibre (+ 12V DC converter from the local electronics store) to a small Storage Tek tape library in stacker mode.&amp;nbsp; Basically, the customer wouldn't listen.&amp;nbsp; They had to go through the pain of burning out the fibre converter a few times and a few impossible restores before they finally broke down and did backup in a way that assured verifiable results and restores...&amp;nbsp; Basically, it's just a bad idea, but I'm guessing your customer is just as stubborn.&amp;nbsp; I guess you can be happy that you don't have HSSDC connections on your filer.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The bad part is that you basically also need one tape library per filer as well.&amp;nbsp; Not exactly a good way to save money because it just doesn't scale.&amp;nbsp; If you have any chance, get them to pay for services rendered and run as far away as you can, hehe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 07:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shaunjurr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-09T07:49:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14218#M1315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer asking about connecting a tape drive directly to a filer. They want to copy CIFS volumes to a tape drive using ONTAP utilities rather than NDMP based backup software. Has anybody any experience of doing this? Are there any gotchas to be aware of?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14218#M1315</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigel_foley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14223#M1316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;dump and restore commands... for example "dump 0fn rst0a jobname /vol/vol0"&amp;nbsp; but you have no robot control, so you have to change tapes manually or find an old library that supports stacker mode.&amp;nbsp; And there is no direct access restore, so all tapes in a backup set have to be mounted and read prior to restore of file regardless of which tape the file resides.&amp;nbsp; I would try to sell them SnapVault and keep dedup retention on disk...manual dump backups won't be easy to maintain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 07:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14223#M1316</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T07:00:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14230#M1317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;*lol* ... I did this for a customer once... from a FAS250 with a hacked HSSDC to fibre (+ 12V DC converter from the local electronics store) to a small Storage Tek tape library in stacker mode.&amp;nbsp; Basically, the customer wouldn't listen.&amp;nbsp; They had to go through the pain of burning out the fibre converter a few times and a few impossible restores before they finally broke down and did backup in a way that assured verifiable results and restores...&amp;nbsp; Basically, it's just a bad idea, but I'm guessing your customer is just as stubborn.&amp;nbsp; I guess you can be happy that you don't have HSSDC connections on your filer.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The bad part is that you basically also need one tape library per filer as well.&amp;nbsp; Not exactly a good way to save money because it just doesn't scale.&amp;nbsp; If you have any chance, get them to pay for services rendered and run as far away as you can, hehe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 07:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14230#M1317</guid>
      <dc:creator>shaunjurr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T07:49:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14237#M1318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if they do manage to get the tape drives directly attached, they won't gain anything by not using NDMP.&amp;nbsp; The only native backup utility in ONTAP is 'dump'&amp;nbsp; and if you look at the NDMP backup process, it's just using dump.&amp;nbsp; As mentioned in another reply, NDMP gives the user the ability to manage the tapes.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If the customer is looking to avoid spending money on a backup application, there are open source Unix/Linux backup applications.&amp;nbsp; However, most use NDMP...and believe me, you get what you pay for - especially when it comes to doing restores.&amp;nbsp; Most people look at backup applications and only consider how fast and reliable the backup is.&amp;nbsp; Backup applications need to be evaluated on the difficulty, reliability, and time-to-recover it takes restore data because that's what you buy them for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14237#M1318</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T14:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14242#M1319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comments. I'll try and get them to look at SnapVault as a better alternative.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14242#M1319</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigel_foley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-10T11:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14247#M1320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shaun&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The customer is very unix literate and think they will save money on backup software. All the responses suggest their thinking is flawed! Thanks again for your comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:18:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14247#M1320</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigel_foley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-10T11:18:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Copying volumes to tape</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14252#M1321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The time to recover argument is quite valid and may strenghthen the case for using SnapVault.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Copying-volumes-to-tape/m-p/14252#M1321</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigel_foley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-10T11:21:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

