<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 1TB FC disk drives availability. in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15777#M1448</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, welcome to the forums.&amp;nbsp; I have not heard anything on the "jungle drums" about 1Tb FC disks.&amp;nbsp; The main issue is the number of spindles vs the 16Tb limit.&amp;nbsp; ie poor total aggregate preformance.&amp;nbsp; {look at DoT v8 if you want bigger than 16Tb}&amp;nbsp; You can look at either 1 Tb SATA and the PAM II card or lots of 300Gb FC disks if total I/O is important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-30T00:09:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1TB FC disk drives availability.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15772#M1447</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working on a project that is going to require a new SAN and I am looking at deploying a FAS31xx series clustered solution. I need to provision an initial requirement of approximately 100TB which will no doubt rise over time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to deploy FC disks and the available capacity will play a major part in my decision on which model filer I purchase. I vaguely remember hearing that 1TB FC disks were soon to be available and wondered if my recollection was correct and if so does anyone have any firm dates?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15772#M1447</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven_jenner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1TB FC disk drives availability.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15777#M1448</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, welcome to the forums.&amp;nbsp; I have not heard anything on the "jungle drums" about 1Tb FC disks.&amp;nbsp; The main issue is the number of spindles vs the 16Tb limit.&amp;nbsp; ie poor total aggregate preformance.&amp;nbsp; {look at DoT v8 if you want bigger than 16Tb}&amp;nbsp; You can look at either 1 Tb SATA and the PAM II card or lots of 300Gb FC disks if total I/O is important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15777#M1448</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-30T00:09:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1TB FC disk drives availability.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15782#M1449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same here actually -- haven't heard anything about 1 TB FC drives (another storage company is doing 600 GB FC FWIW).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For doing 100 TB, you'll want to think about the performance vs. space trade-off. That is, will a bunch of 16 TB aggregates be workable for your data layout? Or will you be better off waiting for ONTap 8 to go final (which will allow aggregates from 20-50 TB or so based on the filer head in question).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/1TB-FC-disk-drives-availability/m-p/15782#M1449</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-30T00:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

