<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Forward compatibility in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16397#M1483</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are tapes encrypted w/ FC-series DataFort able to be decrypted by the Brocade Encryption Switch (given the necessary keys are present of course).&amp;nbsp; What about vice-versa?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>esker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:18:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16397#M1483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are tapes encrypted w/ FC-series DataFort able to be decrypted by the Brocade Encryption Switch (given the necessary keys are present of course).&amp;nbsp; What about vice-versa?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16397#M1483</guid>
      <dc:creator>esker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16402#M1484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the tapes are compatible given the limitation of the DataFort tape header. According&lt;EM&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Fabric OS Encryption Administrators Gude v6.3.0&lt;/SPAN&gt; (53-1001341-02 August 7, 2009 published by Brocade):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: FranklinGothic-Book;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: FranklinGothic-Book;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Only DF version 2.x- and 3.x-compatible NetApp DataFort (DF) tape metaheaders and block formats&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;are supported for reading, decrypting, and decompressing the tapes.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Only DF version 2.x- and 3.x-compatible tape block formats and metaheaders are supported for&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;writing and encrypting tapes in DF-compatible format.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;A DF-compatible license is required.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; font-size: 2; font-family: FranklinGothic-Book; "&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the limitation is that the compatible DataFort tape metaheaders is a 2.x or 3.x revision. The 2.x and 3.x are the release levels that most DataFort tape encryption customers have used over the past 4 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: FranklinGothic-Book; font-size: 2; "&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16402#M1484</guid>
      <dc:creator>edbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-19T22:05:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16408#M1485</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about the forthcoming version 4.x?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16408#M1485</guid>
      <dc:creator>esker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-19T22:26:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16412#M1486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current DataFort FC-series supported OS release is 3.01. There is no announced 4.0 DataFort FC-series release candidate at this time. There may be a confusion with the E-series 4.x release which is currenlty deployed and supports Ethernet protocol encryption rather than fiber channel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16412#M1486</guid>
      <dc:creator>edbrown</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-19T23:09:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16417#M1487</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tapes written through a Brocade Encrypting Switch or DCX FS-18 Encrypting Blade need to be in DataFort Compatibility mode to write encrypted tapes that are readable by NetApp DataFort.&amp;nbsp; When you go to configure your encryption target, you'll see a dropdown for "Desired Encryption Mode".&amp;nbsp; Here you would select "DF-Compatible Encryption".&amp;nbsp; Note that the default is "Native Encryption".&amp;nbsp; BES encrypted tapes using this method will be readable and appendable to DataFort versions 2.2.x and 3.x and higher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:57:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16417#M1487</guid>
      <dc:creator>wmichael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-22T16:57:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forward compatibility</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16421#M1488</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I was confused w/ the forthcoming 4.x LKM release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Forward-compatibility/m-p/16421#M1488</guid>
      <dc:creator>esker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-22T17:00:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

