<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wish list for next version of RCU... in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Wish-list-for-next-version-of-RCU/m-p/18833#M1680</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;trying to use RCU 2.1 and had some problems.&amp;nbsp; Read the release notes and found out that QTREEs and vfilers are not supported.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;I hope in the next version these are fixed/addressed.&amp;nbsp; QTREE's I can get over, its not that big of a deal really, but vfiler's is really important.&amp;nbsp; We use the vfiler -dr option to snapmirror NFS vmware datastores and therefore can't use the RCU.&amp;nbsp; Using vfilers with the -dr option makes it easy to fail over to another site and is critical to our disaster recovery plan.&amp;nbsp; Also, I think this fits into your future data motion plans.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: background-color: #f8fafd;; "&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>highvailsys</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wish list for next version of RCU...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Wish-list-for-next-version-of-RCU/m-p/18833#M1680</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;trying to use RCU 2.1 and had some problems.&amp;nbsp; Read the release notes and found out that QTREEs and vfilers are not supported.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;I hope in the next version these are fixed/addressed.&amp;nbsp; QTREE's I can get over, its not that big of a deal really, but vfiler's is really important.&amp;nbsp; We use the vfiler -dr option to snapmirror NFS vmware datastores and therefore can't use the RCU.&amp;nbsp; Using vfilers with the -dr option makes it easy to fail over to another site and is critical to our disaster recovery plan.&amp;nbsp; Also, I think this fits into your future data motion plans.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style: background-color: #f8fafd;; "&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Wish-list-for-next-version-of-RCU/m-p/18833#M1680</guid>
      <dc:creator>highvailsys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wish list for next version of RCU...</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Wish-list-for-next-version-of-RCU/m-p/18837#M1681</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't discuss product roadmaps in a public forum, but please be assured we hear you loud and clear! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are correct, this is very much inline with NetApp Data Motion™ (IMHO).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for taking a look at RCU and for your valuable feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Wish-list-for-next-version-of-RCU/m-p/18837#M1681</guid>
      <dc:creator>forgette</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-14T16:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

