<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CIFS and small files in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-and-small-files/m-p/18919#M1688</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you'd better open a performance case and let our TSE help you on that. it's not just a easy one to get the answer here. you probably need to get asup and capture the perfstat and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 04:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff_Yao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-06T04:44:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CIFS and small files</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-and-small-files/m-p/18914#M1687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the process of placing my 3140 8.1RC1 into production.&amp;nbsp; We've been testing a few things and Citrix roaming profiles are taking a LOT longer to load vs the EMC NS40 that we are replacing.&amp;nbsp; A lot meaning the NS serves up the same profile in 1/2 the time.&amp;nbsp; We are using SATA drives in both configurations but the 3140 has 20 SATA drives in a single aggregate whereas the NS has only 10.&amp;nbsp; Nothing else going on the 3140 currently.&amp;nbsp; The roaming profiles have tons of small files.&amp;nbsp; Throughput when copying NS-&amp;gt;3140 is pretty stellar - any clues or tips?&amp;nbsp; SMB2 enabled on vfiler.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-and-small-files/m-p/18914#M1687</guid>
      <dc:creator>DANTHEMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS and small files</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-and-small-files/m-p/18919#M1688</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you'd better open a performance case and let our TSE help you on that. it's not just a easy one to get the answer here. you probably need to get asup and capture the perfstat and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 04:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/CIFS-and-small-files/m-p/18919#M1688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff_Yao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T04:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

