<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26063#M2284</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah thats one node. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shane_bradley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-17T22:43:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26036#M2279</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an interesting task: write to array a dump of network traffic from 10Gbit/s channel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Topology is quiet simple: network tap, capture server and NetApp array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp array directly connected to the server via another 10Gbps port. Also I am using NFSv3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I tested this solution with one FAS6250 in cluster mode together with 20HDD of SAS drives or 20HDD of SATA drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Performance is the same (SATA/SAS) - near 450MB per second. This is 2 times slower than I expected... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:"&gt;😃&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We planned to use HA pair of FAS8040 in the future and expected 3000MB speed (2x10Gb links).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now we have a lot of questions. Is it possible? May be we missed some configuration? Could you help me with performance tuning or it is impossible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the capture server (NFS client) side I have mount options:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;type nfs (rw,bg,hard,intr,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,vers=3,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Writing has 32 threads inside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Also I tuned the sysctl.conf parameters:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.rmem_default=524288&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.wmem_default=524288&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.rmem_max=16777216&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.wmem_max=16777216&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 524288 16777216&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 524288 16777216&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.ipfrag_high_thresh=524288&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.ipfrag_low_thresh=393216&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.optmem_max=524287&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;net.core.netdev_max_backlog=2500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sunrpc.tcp_slot_table_entries=128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sunrpc.udp_slot_table_entries=128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will wait your feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26036#M2279</guid>
      <dc:creator>BLACKRABBIT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:31:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26041#M2280</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We'd really need to see a perfstat or at the very least a statit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 03:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26041#M2280</guid>
      <dc:creator>shane_bradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T03:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26046#M2281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Of course! This is perfstat of the best result that we have: &lt;A href="/t5/forums/editpage/board-id/network-storage-protocols-discussions/message-id/link deleted" target="_blank"&gt;[link deleted]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Write speed is near 900MB via two 10Gb links. Aggregate -max-write-alloc-blocks was set to 256K.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26046#M2281</guid>
      <dc:creator>BLACKRABBIT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-10T08:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26050#M2282</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So this is 100% writes? IF so i wouldnt expect an 6250 to have much more in it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would get about ~1.3GB/s max write onto our FAS6280's the best i've seen was a FAS80x0 with SSD doing about 3.5GB/s (but that was disk bound on 20 data spindles.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26050#M2282</guid>
      <dc:creator>shane_bradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-14T21:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26058#M2283</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. My result for 100% write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your results only for one node? Can I expect double result for the HA-pair?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26058#M2283</guid>
      <dc:creator>BLACKRABBIT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-15T10:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS performance on 10Gb link</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26063#M2284</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah thats one node. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-performance-on-10Gb-link/m-p/26063#M2284</guid>
      <dc:creator>shane_bradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-17T22:43:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

