<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Flash Cache and CIFS-Shares - Problem? in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35357#M3208</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;last month our new FAS3270 was installed. The system is still in test stage at present, but it shall be used productively&amp;nbsp; soon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;The FAS3270 is fitted with a 512GB Flash Cache Card. We've got no experiencies with this card and it's performance, therefore we are testing. Under consideration of "TR-3832 Flash Cache Best Practices Guide" we created different volumes (with identical parameters - &lt;EM&gt;priority set volume volumename cache=keep)&lt;/EM&gt; , declared as LUNs and CIFS-Shares. Now we began copy data from LUN to LUN, from CIFS-share to CIFS-share and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With "stats show -p flexscale-access" we can see (&lt;STRONG&gt;Hit /s&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;Hit %&lt;/STRONG&gt;) that the Flash Card is used by read access with volumes witch are created as LUNs. But it looks like the Cache is not used by read access with CIFS-Shares. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copy data&amp;amp;colon; LUN to LUN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/16493_pastedImage_17.png" style="width: 617px; height: 169px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copy - the same -&amp;nbsp; data&amp;amp;colon; CIFS-Share to CIFS-Share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/16506_pastedImage_18.png" style="width: 610px; height: 408px;" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sanadmin_stadtdo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:21:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flash Cache and CIFS-Shares - Problem?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35357#M3208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;last month our new FAS3270 was installed. The system is still in test stage at present, but it shall be used productively&amp;nbsp; soon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="translated_text"&gt;The FAS3270 is fitted with a 512GB Flash Cache Card. We've got no experiencies with this card and it's performance, therefore we are testing. Under consideration of "TR-3832 Flash Cache Best Practices Guide" we created different volumes (with identical parameters - &lt;EM&gt;priority set volume volumename cache=keep)&lt;/EM&gt; , declared as LUNs and CIFS-Shares. Now we began copy data from LUN to LUN, from CIFS-share to CIFS-share and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With "stats show -p flexscale-access" we can see (&lt;STRONG&gt;Hit /s&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;Hit %&lt;/STRONG&gt;) that the Flash Card is used by read access with volumes witch are created as LUNs. But it looks like the Cache is not used by read access with CIFS-Shares. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copy data&amp;amp;colon; LUN to LUN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/16493_pastedImage_17.png" style="width: 617px; height: 169px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copy - the same -&amp;nbsp; data&amp;amp;colon; CIFS-Share to CIFS-Share&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://community.netapp.com/legacyfs/online/16506_pastedImage_18.png" style="width: 610px; height: 408px;" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35357#M3208</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_stadtdo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:21:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flash Cache and CIFS-Shares - Problem?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35362#M3209</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;usualy the data needs to be cached once. means you copy the first time, no hits, you copy the second time, more hits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your lun data could be already cached as the servers are already using the data before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did you try reading a dataset twice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35362#M3209</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-10T13:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flash Cache and CIFS-Shares - Problem?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35367#M3210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, we 've copied the dataset (5GB - with 5.166 files of different size) more than one time. To test the performance, we copy the datasets repeatedly at different times. By using LUNs it looks fine, by CIFS-Shares - no cache access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Flash-Cache-and-CIFS-Shares-Problem/m-p/35367#M3210</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_stadtdo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-13T05:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

