<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;lock break&amp;quot; command responds defferently from older version did in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37144#M3391</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've just upgraded Data ONTAP 8.0P6　to 8.0.1P3,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and "lock break" command has changed its response to displays a warning to terminate CIFS first.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to avoid responding this warning, and to automate executing "lock break" command ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The warning is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Warning: The CIFS protocol or the affected CIFS sessions must be terminated&amp;nbsp; before issuing the command.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Do you want to continue{y|n}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tatsuro_handa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"lock break" command responds defferently from older version did</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37144#M3391</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've just upgraded Data ONTAP 8.0P6　to 8.0.1P3,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and "lock break" command has changed its response to displays a warning to terminate CIFS first.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to avoid responding this warning, and to automate executing "lock break" command ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The warning is as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Warning: The CIFS protocol or the affected CIFS sessions must be terminated&amp;nbsp; before issuing the command.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Do you want to continue{y|n}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37144#M3391</guid>
      <dc:creator>tatsuro_handa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "lock break" command responds defferently from older version did</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37150#M3392</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer asking about the same issue.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully kicking the dust off of this will help generate more responses.&amp;nbsp; If I find info outside of this thread I will post it here.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37150#M3392</guid>
      <dc:creator>SIRTECHIE42</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-02T20:09:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "lock break" command responds defferently from older version did</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37155#M3393</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any news on this? I'm wary about this new warning... Will it terminate just the CIFS session, or CIFS protocol itself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:15:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/quot-lock-break-quot-command-responds-defferently-from-older-version-did/m-p/37155#M3393</guid>
      <dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-17T12:15:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

