<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: users have full control on a share but could not access one of folders underneath in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38801#M3553</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which types of storage objects are involved on the NetApp side? Is the share a volume? What about the problematic folder, is it just a folder, or is it a separate qtree?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it is just a folder, then the issue should be solvable by the owner / from the windows side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it is a NetApp qtree then these have their own security/access properties ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look at the output from ontap commands such as: "qtree status" and "cifs status", note the security style reported in the output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See also Knowledge Base entry 1012304: &lt;A class="active_link" href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1012304&amp;amp;locale=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1012304&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An ONTAP command "fsecurity" may also be useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On Windows I often use an open source tool called "setacl". See: &lt;A href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/setacl/" target="_blank"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/projects/setacl/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yours,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WAFLHERDER</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-09T15:38:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>users have full control on a share but could not access one of folders underneath</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38796#M3552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our users have full access to a share, abc$, and on the window side they have full access to all folders under abc$ except one folder. Is this something NetApp admin&amp;nbsp; can do to allow them to acccess the folder, or is this something the owner of the folder on the window side has to grant the access?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38796#M3552</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:52:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: users have full control on a share but could not access one of folders underneath</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38801#M3553</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which types of storage objects are involved on the NetApp side? Is the share a volume? What about the problematic folder, is it just a folder, or is it a separate qtree?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it is just a folder, then the issue should be solvable by the owner / from the windows side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it is a NetApp qtree then these have their own security/access properties ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look at the output from ontap commands such as: "qtree status" and "cifs status", note the security style reported in the output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See also Knowledge Base entry 1012304: &lt;A class="active_link" href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1012304&amp;amp;locale=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1012304&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An ONTAP command "fsecurity" may also be useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On Windows I often use an open source tool called "setacl". See: &lt;A href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/setacl/" target="_blank"&gt;http://sourceforge.net/projects/setacl/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yours,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38801#M3553</guid>
      <dc:creator>WAFLHERDER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-09T15:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: users have full control on a share but could not access one of folders underneath</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38811#M3554</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming the volume is ntfs security, this is managed on the windows side, either by the AD guys or, as you say, the owner of the folder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/users-have-full-control-on-a-share-but-could-not-access-one-of-folders/m-p/38811#M3554</guid>
      <dc:creator>billshaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-09T16:33:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

