<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance penalty for using access enumeration in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Performance-penalty-for-using-access-enumeration/m-p/43838#M4005</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Maico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I currently use ABE in a small environment ~500, and have used it in environments with thousands of users hitting a single share with ABE enabled.&amp;nbsp; There has been no noticeable impact on the filer in either environment, and switching it on for existing shares has never elicited a call from the customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>columbus_admin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-24T12:22:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance penalty for using access enumeration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Performance-penalty-for-using-access-enumeration/m-p/43833#M4004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if there is a performance penalty for enabling access base enumeration on a share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maico&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Performance-penalty-for-using-access-enumeration/m-p/43833#M4004</guid>
      <dc:creator>mdvillanueva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:22:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance penalty for using access enumeration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Performance-penalty-for-using-access-enumeration/m-p/43838#M4005</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Maico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I currently use ABE in a small environment ~500, and have used it in environments with thousands of users hitting a single share with ABE enabled.&amp;nbsp; There has been no noticeable impact on the filer in either environment, and switching it on for existing shares has never elicited a call from the customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Performance-penalty-for-using-access-enumeration/m-p/43838#M4005</guid>
      <dc:creator>columbus_admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-24T12:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

