<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to achieve 100TB volumes without GX in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50043#M4594</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Virtual File Manager (VFM) or even Widelinks to create a namespace (if CIFS) works... it won't get you one big directory over 12TB usable but most of our customers who think they need a 100TB mount point can easily have 10x 10TB volumes on the backend as long as each show under the same directory structure... use DFS or widelinks to create a root namespace then stitch the volumes wherever you want.. none of the buckets will hold over 10-12TB usable but the top level will be a large mount point.&amp;nbsp; If you need a 100TB directory (ouch) then other customers of ours have Acopia which splits writes by files across multiple volumes without going to GX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-25T20:20:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to achieve 100TB volumes without GX</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50039#M4592</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need volumes which are greater tehn 12TB&amp;nbsp; for our applications. Did anyone achieve this with any third party applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:29:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50039#M4592</guid>
      <dc:creator>allsrupa4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:29:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to achieve 100TB volumes without GX</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50043#M4594</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Virtual File Manager (VFM) or even Widelinks to create a namespace (if CIFS) works... it won't get you one big directory over 12TB usable but most of our customers who think they need a 100TB mount point can easily have 10x 10TB volumes on the backend as long as each show under the same directory structure... use DFS or widelinks to create a root namespace then stitch the volumes wherever you want.. none of the buckets will hold over 10-12TB usable but the top level will be a large mount point.&amp;nbsp; If you need a 100TB directory (ouch) then other customers of ours have Acopia which splits writes by files across multiple volumes without going to GX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50043#M4594</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-25T20:20:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to achieve 100TB volumes without GX</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50047#M4596</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for suggestions. We are looking for using it for NFS environment. How well does acopia work with NFS environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/How-to-achieve-100TB-volumes-without-GX/m-p/50047#M4596</guid>
      <dc:creator>allsrupa4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-26T14:00:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

