<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3140 and FCP in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52499#M4828</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I have a big NAS deployment that runs on the other head so I guess I'll need to schedule some downtime when I unhinge that one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DANTHEMAN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-13T17:01:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3140 and FCP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52488#M4826</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moving on to configuring block-level access on my new 3140, I realized that half the FCP ports are configured as initiators.&amp;nbsp; Since I have no fiber shelves or plans to hook up a fiber-attached tape drive, is there any reason I should not configure all of the ports as targets?&amp;nbsp; I currently have four FC switches.&amp;nbsp; Eventually these will be collapsed into two but for now it would be much easier to all four ports on each controller.&amp;nbsp; Stinks that I have to reboot for the change to take effect!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52488#M4826</guid>
      <dc:creator>DANTHEMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3140 and FCP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52492#M4827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can do takeover/giveback instead of reboot. For FCP/iSCSI/NFS it should be fully transparent (of course there are other considerations like PAM rewarming).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:17:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52492#M4827</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-13T16:17:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3140 and FCP</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52499#M4828</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I have a big NAS deployment that runs on the other head so I guess I'll need to schedule some downtime when I unhinge that one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/3140-and-FCP/m-p/52499#M4828</guid>
      <dc:creator>DANTHEMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-13T17:01:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

