<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Apple and Decru Datafort Connectivity in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Apple-and-Decru-Datafort-Connectivity/m-p/4962#M491</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want to just jump in and burst your bubble, but this is one of those requests that will never make much (if any) traction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently there is no "new" development going on for the DataFort.&amp;nbsp; The DataFort has been hardware and feature locked for some time now, and are (probably) soon to be announced at end of life and end of availability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Historically Mac operating systems were never tested by Decru QA.&amp;nbsp; Your statement of using Snow Leopard (10.6) over CIFS is far better than any of the previous versions (10.4 and 10.5).&amp;nbsp; I believe that there was a bug in those versions that did not allow for proper browsing of shares,,,,,,,,, rather you had to point directly to it (know the path structure). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At any rate, the only way you would get any attention on this would be to throw millions of dollars at NetApp as a net new project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Decru will not support it currently or in the future.&amp;nbsp; If you do try and use it, they will very very clear that it is at your own risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just from my own personal experience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need something encrypted, get a SAN and buy a BES from Brocade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stratify_tc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-20T19:33:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Apple and Decru Datafort Connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Apple-and-Decru-Datafort-Connectivity/m-p/4959#M490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using the Decru Datafort with Apple Snow Leopard for almost a year successfully. I am curious if anyone else out there is using Apple via CIFS to connect to the Decru Datafort? Any thoughts, suggestions, considerations? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apple is currently NOT on the Decru supported list. But since we have been using it now for over a year, I wonder what the process is to get it on the list?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone at Netapp even done rudimentary testing on the two?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Apple-and-Decru-Datafort-Connectivity/m-p/4959#M490</guid>
      <dc:creator>redhaute1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:19:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Apple and Decru Datafort Connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Apple-and-Decru-Datafort-Connectivity/m-p/4962#M491</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want to just jump in and burst your bubble, but this is one of those requests that will never make much (if any) traction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently there is no "new" development going on for the DataFort.&amp;nbsp; The DataFort has been hardware and feature locked for some time now, and are (probably) soon to be announced at end of life and end of availability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Historically Mac operating systems were never tested by Decru QA.&amp;nbsp; Your statement of using Snow Leopard (10.6) over CIFS is far better than any of the previous versions (10.4 and 10.5).&amp;nbsp; I believe that there was a bug in those versions that did not allow for proper browsing of shares,,,,,,,,, rather you had to point directly to it (know the path structure). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At any rate, the only way you would get any attention on this would be to throw millions of dollars at NetApp as a net new project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Decru will not support it currently or in the future.&amp;nbsp; If you do try and use it, they will very very clear that it is at your own risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just from my own personal experience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need something encrypted, get a SAN and buy a BES from Brocade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Apple-and-Decru-Datafort-Connectivity/m-p/4962#M491</guid>
      <dc:creator>stratify_tc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-20T19:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

