<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Poor NFS Performance and CISCO Flowcontrol in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-Performance-and-CISCO-Flowcontrol/m-p/5278#M537</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This worked perfectly for us!&amp;nbsp; Thank you so much for posting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dkemm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-22T13:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor NFS Performance and CISCO Flowcontrol</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-Performance-and-CISCO-Flowcontrol/m-p/5274#M536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a quick warning to anyone who might be in a similar situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had an issue where our Cisco Switches were not configured for Flow Control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the following document&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb8532" target="_blank"&gt;https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb8532&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we made the necessary changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, although we had redundant paths we still lost all communications with the NetApp!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically if you change the flowcontrol of the switch port to ON, this may be incompatible with the Flowcontrol of the Etherchannel.&amp;nbsp; It is not possible to set the flowcontrol of the Etherchannel in the Web Interface, it is only possible to set this in the CLI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The effect of this incompatibility is that the entire etherchannel is suspended and communications are lost to the Filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Be aware if you need to make these changes SHUT DOWN ANY SERVICES THAT ARE USING THE FILER FIRST.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-Performance-and-CISCO-Flowcontrol/m-p/5274#M536</guid>
      <dc:creator>marksourbutts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS Performance and CISCO Flowcontrol</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-Performance-and-CISCO-Flowcontrol/m-p/5278#M537</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This worked perfectly for us!&amp;nbsp; Thank you so much for posting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-Performance-and-CISCO-Flowcontrol/m-p/5278#M537</guid>
      <dc:creator>dkemm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-22T13:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

