<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA and protocol latency reporting in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61323#M5582</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;10 thousands of microseconds is not huge. It is just 10ms, which is not spectacular, but far below "huge".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-15T03:38:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA and protocol latency reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61318#M5581</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does the "Average Latency per Protocol" graph/stat truly indicate in PA for NFS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it latency for every NFS op that it's satisfying?&amp;nbsp; Some of them?&amp;nbsp; The highest latent operation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't fully understand it because in PA, and running sysstat, there can be things going on that all seem to be happening very quickly, yet latency is huge.&amp;nbsp; I mean in the tens of thousands of microseconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The particular case in question is attached as png (hopefully).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61318#M5581</guid>
      <dc:creator>jkennedy_4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA and protocol latency reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61323#M5582</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;10 thousands of microseconds is not huge. It is just 10ms, which is not spectacular, but far below "huge".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61323#M5582</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T03:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA and protocol latency reporting</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61327#M5583</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it were only 10k microseconds, maybe.  But note the png I attached to the post, it shows 25k-35k microseconds.  25-35 milliseconds is pretty darned huge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff Kennedy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Qualcomm, Incorporated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QCT Engineering Compute&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;858-651-6592&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/PA-and-protocol-latency-reporting/m-p/61327#M5583</guid>
      <dc:creator>jkennedy_4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T07:28:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

