<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Load Blancing Policy in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Load-Blancing-Policy/m-p/62729#M5674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to know what is the best practice for load balancing my Netapp 3140. Currently my controller #1 is quite a bit "busier" than controller 2. In viewing the OPS in Operations Manager, the majority of the traffic is from CIFS and NFS, iSCSI is "sleeping". On controller 2 although it is less busy than controller 1 the iSCSI OPS are significantly higher. I am in the process of putting a rather OPS intensive database on via iSCSI and need to know which Controller I should host the prod DB Lun on. Controller 1 which is overall more busy but iSCSI is not busy at all, or Controller 2 which is less busy but iSCSI is more busy. I apologize if this is confusing... Also does anyone have a "safe" number of OPS per protocal that should not be exceeded per Netapp controller?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>qanderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:48:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Blancing Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Load-Blancing-Policy/m-p/62729#M5674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to know what is the best practice for load balancing my Netapp 3140. Currently my controller #1 is quite a bit "busier" than controller 2. In viewing the OPS in Operations Manager, the majority of the traffic is from CIFS and NFS, iSCSI is "sleeping". On controller 2 although it is less busy than controller 1 the iSCSI OPS are significantly higher. I am in the process of putting a rather OPS intensive database on via iSCSI and need to know which Controller I should host the prod DB Lun on. Controller 1 which is overall more busy but iSCSI is not busy at all, or Controller 2 which is less busy but iSCSI is more busy. I apologize if this is confusing... Also does anyone have a "safe" number of OPS per protocal that should not be exceeded per Netapp controller?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Load-Blancing-Policy/m-p/62729#M5674</guid>
      <dc:creator>qanderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:48:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Load Blancing Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Load-Blancing-Policy/m-p/62733#M5675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I might also look into the CPU and disk utilization as well, while considering load distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;Also need to keep in mind, each system should bebalanced such that in case of a cluster failover, surviving node can take the fullload.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:39:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Load-Blancing-Policy/m-p/62733#M5675</guid>
      <dc:creator>baijulal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-04T20:39:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

