<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Will a moved file reference the same blocks? in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Will-a-moved-file-reference-the-same-blocks/m-p/64903#M5899</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on how you do the move, and from where to where.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you move files from one volume to another, the blocks will NOT be reused. If you move a file inside a volume, the blocks will get reused as the file basically only gets a new name. You have to do a "real" move though, a "copy &amp;amp; delete original" style operation will of course not work and will always result in new data blocks being used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's no way around this as it is how WAFL works (i.e. block-level re-use only works inside the same volume)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-12T13:00:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Will a moved file reference the same blocks?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Will-a-moved-file-reference-the-same-blocks/m-p/64898#M5898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have someone planning on a large scale restructuring on their CIFS share's directory structure. When a file is moved, will it still point to the same blocks? I imagine the inodes for the source and destination directories will be updated accordingly so there will be no write operation. This is a function of WAFL and not the access method (CIFS), right? So if they use Windows' move or Robocopy it should behave the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Will-a-moved-file-reference-the-same-blocks/m-p/64898#M5898</guid>
      <dc:creator>rjordan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:51:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will a moved file reference the same blocks?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Will-a-moved-file-reference-the-same-blocks/m-p/64903#M5899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on how you do the move, and from where to where.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you move files from one volume to another, the blocks will NOT be reused. If you move a file inside a volume, the blocks will get reused as the file basically only gets a new name. You have to do a "real" move though, a "copy &amp;amp; delete original" style operation will of course not work and will always result in new data blocks being used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's no way around this as it is how WAFL works (i.e. block-level re-use only works inside the same volume)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Will-a-moved-file-reference-the-same-blocks/m-p/64903#M5899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-12T13:00:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

