<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DMZ in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65940#M5991</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK.. sorry I missed that earlier. Earlier this was not the case, so seems like it is supported now. But as Radek had also pointed out towards the multistore option, that's an excellent feature to be able to join different Windows domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reena</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-01T21:57:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65912#M5985</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to expose the netapp to a node that is not part of its registered domain?&amp;nbsp; For example:&amp;nbsp; I have DMZ servers that need to pull web updates from a Netapp share.&amp;nbsp; Is this possible?&amp;nbsp; Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65912#M5985</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexgiles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:20:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65917#M5986</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &amp;amp; welcome to the communities! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typically that can be handled in two ways:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) on a clustered system each controller can join different domains (or only one can join a domain)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) if this is a single-controller setup, or more granularity / domain joins are required, then MultiStore license will help - this can split a physical filer into multiple vFilers &amp;amp; each of them can join different domains&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65917#M5986</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T09:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65924#M5988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Be careful about the clustered systems, it's not recommended for the failover reasons. If the 2 controllers are participating in different domains,&amp;nbsp; then during the failover, the taking over system won't be able to join the other domain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;Reena&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65924#M5988</guid>
      <dc:creator>reena</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T18:57:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65928#M5989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #f8fafd;"&gt;If the 2 controllers are participating in different domains,&amp;nbsp; then during the failover, the taking over system won't be able to join the other domain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;And why is that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failed over controller exist as a virtual entity inside the other controller memory, so it still has its unique host name, separate CIFS server, different IP addresses, etc. - so IMHO it shouldn't be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if I am missing something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65928#M5989</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T21:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65934#M5990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It works to have different domains...&amp;nbsp; the partner does share some options, time, etc. in failover, but not domain settings... supported per the link below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel7261/html/ontap/cluster/failing_over/concept/c_oc_fo_aa-characteristics.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel7261/html/ontap/cluster/failing_over/concept/c_oc_fo_aa-characteristics.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1 class="topictitle1"&gt;Characteristics of nodes in an &lt;SPAN id="ph_cf_12121768582020"&gt;&lt;A name="ph_cf_12121768582020" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;!-- --&gt;&lt;/A&gt;active/active configuration&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;They can reside on the same Windows domain or on different domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65934#M5990</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T21:34:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65940#M5991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK.. sorry I missed that earlier. Earlier this was not the case, so seems like it is supported now. But as Radek had also pointed out towards the multistore option, that's an excellent feature to be able to join different Windows domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/DMZ/m-p/65940#M5991</guid>
      <dc:creator>reena</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-01T21:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

