<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ontap 8.1 Cluster Mode w/Cluster Peer 3000 miles away in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Ontap-8-1-Cluster-Mode-w-Cluster-Peer-3000-miles-away/m-p/67346#M6181</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about the limits of cluster peers in 8.1CM. Let's assume the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Brocade VDX ethernet fabric in two data facilities, LA and NYC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Ethernet fabric extended from NYC to LA via 1Gbps ethernet private line&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. 2 FAS32xx dual controller w/FCoE CNA's running 8.1CM - a pair per facility&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I create a single namespace file system with the ethernet fabric extended (compressed and encrypted via Brocade VCS Fabric Extension) to the other two FAS32xx nodes? My thinking is that if I can stretch layer 2 from NYC to LA and have a single global namespace. This way I can have multiple "active-active" datacenters serving structured content anywhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this possible over such a distance? Is a WAN accelerator recommended for "semi-sync" replication? I think the distance might be the gating factor here, but correct me if I'm wrong. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The goal is a single namespace w/ONTAP 8.1 ala GlusterFS and Isilon - but with an FC target for databases and NFS for everything else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PMCANDREW</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ontap 8.1 Cluster Mode w/Cluster Peer 3000 miles away</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Ontap-8-1-Cluster-Mode-w-Cluster-Peer-3000-miles-away/m-p/67346#M6181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about the limits of cluster peers in 8.1CM. Let's assume the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Brocade VDX ethernet fabric in two data facilities, LA and NYC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Ethernet fabric extended from NYC to LA via 1Gbps ethernet private line&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. 2 FAS32xx dual controller w/FCoE CNA's running 8.1CM - a pair per facility&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I create a single namespace file system with the ethernet fabric extended (compressed and encrypted via Brocade VCS Fabric Extension) to the other two FAS32xx nodes? My thinking is that if I can stretch layer 2 from NYC to LA and have a single global namespace. This way I can have multiple "active-active" datacenters serving structured content anywhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this possible over such a distance? Is a WAN accelerator recommended for "semi-sync" replication? I think the distance might be the gating factor here, but correct me if I'm wrong. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The goal is a single namespace w/ONTAP 8.1 ala GlusterFS and Isilon - but with an FC target for databases and NFS for everything else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Ontap-8-1-Cluster-Mode-w-Cluster-Peer-3000-miles-away/m-p/67346#M6181</guid>
      <dc:creator>PMCANDREW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 8.1 Cluster Mode w/Cluster Peer 3000 miles away</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Ontap-8-1-Cluster-Mode-w-Cluster-Peer-3000-miles-away/m-p/67350#M6183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, this solution is currently not supported. May I suggest contacting your local NetApp SE and cluster-mode expert for a more detailed discussion? There may be other ways to provide the functional outcome you are seeking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Ontap-8-1-Cluster-Mode-w-Cluster-Peer-3000-miles-away/m-p/67350#M6183</guid>
      <dc:creator>aaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-07T08:51:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

