<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dirs with large number files (100k) too slow for backup - NDMP OK?? in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Dirs-with-large-number-files-100k-too-slow-for-backup-NDMP-OK/m-p/71742#M6520</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't expect this for only 100K files, but the behavior is pretty typical, and not at all unique to NetApp.&amp;nbsp; If you put a bunch of small files anywhere you'll get similar results.&amp;nbsp; It's an issue with the filesystem trying to scan the number of inodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>billshaffer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-03T23:53:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dirs with large number files (100k) too slow for backup - NDMP OK??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Dirs-with-large-number-files-100k-too-slow-for-backup-NDMP-OK/m-p/71737#M6519</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem :&amp;nbsp; Backing up dirs with 100,000 small files fails.&amp;nbsp; Using NetBackup and backing them up as NFS mounts on the Linux box&amp;nbsp; times out. Tested NetBackup timeout settings extensively they still fail. Listing an individual file is OK but listing the entire contents suing the ls command is very slow&amp;nbsp; [ 7-10 mins].&amp;nbsp; This explains why the backups fail. Backing up the same data using NDMP via NetBackup is a respectable ~100MB/s.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding NetApp and a 100,00 small files while always exhibit this slow behaviour - true? Any technotes on this?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Dirs-with-large-number-files-100k-too-slow-for-backup-NDMP-OK/m-p/71737#M6519</guid>
      <dc:creator>JM01JM01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:48:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dirs with large number files (100k) too slow for backup - NDMP OK??</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Dirs-with-large-number-files-100k-too-slow-for-backup-NDMP-OK/m-p/71742#M6520</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't expect this for only 100K files, but the behavior is pretty typical, and not at all unique to NetApp.&amp;nbsp; If you put a bunch of small files anywhere you'll get similar results.&amp;nbsp; It's an issue with the filesystem trying to scan the number of inodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Dirs-with-large-number-files-100k-too-slow-for-backup-NDMP-OK/m-p/71742#M6520</guid>
      <dc:creator>billshaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-03T23:53:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

