<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NFS 16 groups limit in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-16-groups-limit/m-p/77907#M7057</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have come to a point where we can no longer use NFS if there is this 16 group limit. I read a few articles on the net to overcome this issue but using NFSv4 with Kerberos or ACL is not possible since we are still running a lot of SLES9 and Solaris 8 installations. Any other ideas? We are using mixed security since a few very very old programs really rely on unix security while all documents are written in microsoft office so we also need NTFS security. It's a really really special environment where development is carried out on Linux/Unix and the documentation is done on Windows PC's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help or ideas would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oweinmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:05:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NFS 16 groups limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-16-groups-limit/m-p/77907#M7057</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have come to a point where we can no longer use NFS if there is this 16 group limit. I read a few articles on the net to overcome this issue but using NFSv4 with Kerberos or ACL is not possible since we are still running a lot of SLES9 and Solaris 8 installations. Any other ideas? We are using mixed security since a few very very old programs really rely on unix security while all documents are written in microsoft office so we also need NTFS security. It's a really really special environment where development is carried out on Linux/Unix and the documentation is done on Windows PC's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help or ideas would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-16-groups-limit/m-p/77907#M7057</guid>
      <dc:creator>oweinmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:05:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS 16 groups limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-16-groups-limit/m-p/77911#M7058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oliver Weinmann schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have come to a point where we can no longer use NFS if there is this 16 group limit. I read a few articles on the net to overcome this issue but using NFSv4 with Kerberos or ACL is not possible since we are still running a lot of SLES9 and Solaris 8 installations. Any other ideas? We are using mixed security since a few very very old programs really rely on unix security while all documents are written in microsoft office so we also need NTFS security. It's a really really special environment where development is carried out on Linux/Unix and the documentation is done on Windows PC's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help or ideas would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oliver Weinmann schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have come to a point where we can no longer use NFS if there is this 16 group limit. I read a few articles on the net to overcome this issue but using NFSv4 with Kerberos or ACL is not possible since we are still running a lot of SLES9 and Solaris 8 installations. Any other ideas? We are using mixed security since a few very very old programs really rely on unix security while all documents are written in microsoft office so we also need NTFS security. It's a really really special environment where development is carried out on Linux/Unix and the documentation is done on Windows PC's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help or ideas would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;After a long time I started investigating NFSv4 with SLES11 and Ubuntu 10.04. With NFSv4 32 groups are supported. Currently it is working without kerberos but using nfs4_getfacl doesn't correctly list the permissions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;creaing a file as user oweinmann:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;oweinmann@ubuntutest:/mnt/nfsv4test$ touch file_oweinmann&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;oweinmann@ubuntutest:/mnt/nfsv4test$ ls -al&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;total 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;drwxr-xr-x 5 oweinmann domain users 4096 2011-11-14 09:52 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;drwxr-xr-x 4 root&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; root&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 2011-11-14 09:51 ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw-r--r-- 1 oweinmann domain users&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 2011-11-14 09:52 file_oweinmann&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Posix ACL looks fine. But I would expect the nfsv4 acl to reflect this as well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;root@ubuntutest:/mnt/nfsv4test# nfs4_getfacl /mnt/nfsv4test&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A::OWNER@:rwaDxtTnNcCy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D::OWNER@:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A:g:GROUP@:rxtncy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D:g:GROUP@:waDTC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A::EVERYONE@:rxtncy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;D::EVERYONE@:waDTC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I need kerberos in order for the ACL to show up correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oliver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-16-groups-limit/m-p/77911#M7058</guid>
      <dc:creator>oweinmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-14T09:56:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

