<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NFS files permissions set to zero. in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81224#M7353</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most likely there are ACLs on those files so the 000 permissions aren't real.&amp;nbsp; You've got a couple of options here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want UNIX style security, then you'll want to chmod the files to what you want (even -R or * should do the trick).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want NTFS permissions, then make sure your user mapping are good such that you can access the data.&amp;nbsp; Your NFS user will be mapped to a Windows user and the permissions enforced that way.&amp;nbsp; In this mode, you can basically ignore the UNIX permissions because they aren't used anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best choice is the side that you want to be able to *change* permissions.&amp;nbsp; Pick the side where you want that to happen and then choose the security style accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind that by default /vol/vol0/etc is usually not a qtree (it should be, IMHO), so you may end up having to change the permission on the root qtree /vol/vol0/ &amp;lt;- note the trailing /.&amp;nbsp; Unless you've converted it to a qtree.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adamfox</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-21T15:18:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NFS files permissions set to zero.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81220#M7351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a v3020 device running OnTap 7.2.3 with NFS exporting vol0/etc$ for monitoring purposes. I have started to have problems when I installed CIFS and run the CIFS wizard. My monitoring script stopped working because it couldn't access vol0/etc$ anymore. I did some investigation and I found out that the qtree for vol0/etc$ was set to NTFS. I changed to UNIX (and even MIXED) but I still had problems. In the end I realised that the files permissions for vol0/etc$ were all set to 0. Accessing vol0/etc$ from CIFS works fine but I would like to fix the NFS permissions as they were originally. There are quite a lot of files and I was looking for a quick fix or at least automated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81220#M7351</guid>
      <dc:creator>NicZarrilli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS files permissions set to zero.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81224#M7353</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most likely there are ACLs on those files so the 000 permissions aren't real.&amp;nbsp; You've got a couple of options here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want UNIX style security, then you'll want to chmod the files to what you want (even -R or * should do the trick).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want NTFS permissions, then make sure your user mapping are good such that you can access the data.&amp;nbsp; Your NFS user will be mapped to a Windows user and the permissions enforced that way.&amp;nbsp; In this mode, you can basically ignore the UNIX permissions because they aren't used anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best choice is the side that you want to be able to *change* permissions.&amp;nbsp; Pick the side where you want that to happen and then choose the security style accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind that by default /vol/vol0/etc is usually not a qtree (it should be, IMHO), so you may end up having to change the permission on the root qtree /vol/vol0/ &amp;lt;- note the trailing /.&amp;nbsp; Unless you've converted it to a qtree.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81224#M7353</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamfox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-21T15:18:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NFS files permissions set to zero.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81233#M7358</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have installed CIFS only because I was messing about with a Windows SnapDrive and I needed to do some tests with iSCSI. Because SnapDrive connects to the NetApp box using RPC by default I found out that the only way for RPC to work was to install CIFS. So I did and probably have inadvertently chosen the NTFS only option. Later I found out how to connect SnapDrive using https but that was too late.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to put the box back to its original condition with the vol0/etc$ NFS export having all those files back to their original permissions. I don't really care about CIFS at this point in time and in fact I have disabled it. It is important that the vol0/etc$ export works because this box is part of a cluster which is supposed to take over the other node if it fails. This is why we need to monitor the boxes (we are using a product called big-brother from a Unix server) and the monitoring for this box stopped working. We could change the permissions for just the file we need (and in fact we actually did) but I am wondering: is the device is a state able to support a live service as it is now? I believe so but some of my colleagues are a bit more skeptical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much, Nic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/NFS-files-permissions-set-to-zero/m-p/81233#M7358</guid>
      <dc:creator>NicZarrilli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-21T15:34:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

