<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552 in Network and Storage Protocols</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109655#M7966</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The good news is that 8.3.1 is GA today. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it works out for you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-10T15:49:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109479#M7954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have opened a support case #2005847149 but I haven't received any help to speak of over the last week plus. &amp;nbsp;My reseller has been providing us with some help but we have been unable to come to a solution. &amp;nbsp;So here goes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are replacing a FAS2040 system with a FAS2552 system. &amp;nbsp;The new system has more disks, SSD used for cache, and is running on 10Gbe, the FAS2040 is running on 1Gbe. &amp;nbsp;We primarily use NFS shares to host VMDKs. &amp;nbsp;Our NFS synchronous performance issue was discovered in this configuration but also is easily duplicated on NFSv3 shares. &amp;nbsp;A RH server has one NFS share mounted from the FAS2040 (7 mode) and one mounted from the FAS2552 (cluster mode), same mount options, same everything...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FAS2040&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;administrator$ time dd if=empty.b1 of=empty.dd oflag=dsync bs=8k&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12304+0 records in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12304+0 records out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100794368 bytes (101 MB) copied, 4.76166 s,&lt;STRONG&gt; 21.2 MB/s&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;real &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;0m4.806s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;user &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;0m0.000s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sys &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 0m0.328s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FAS2552:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;administrator$ time dd if=empty.b1 of=empty.dd oflag=dsync bs=8k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12304+0 records in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;12304+0 records out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100794368 bytes (101 MB) copied, 38.0357 s, &lt;STRONG&gt;2.6 MB/s&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;real &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;0m38.064s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;user &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;0m0.024s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sys &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 0m0.400s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the question is: does cluster mode have this much overhead or is there something fundamentally wrong with our FAS2552 or our configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109479#M7954</guid>
      <dc:creator>shider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T23:22:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109536#M7957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check out TR-4067:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4067.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4067.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, page 15 regarding RPC slots. Try adjusting those to use 128 slots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, be sure you are mounting directly to the data LIF on the node that owns the volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds like this isn't an ESX NFS issue but a RHEL guest mounting to the cluster issue. Accurate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109536#M7957</guid>
      <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-08T14:06:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109543#M7958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry to hear that your 2552 is not working as well as it could right now. As stated above the TR likely will help find what is causing the issue. I know this is presenting in RHEL vs VMware but they are very similar and easy to debug from that end as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few things to take a look at:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have Virtual Storage Console (VSC) installed on vCenter? If so have you optimized the hosts and installed the VAAI plugin?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you ran&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://mysupport.netapp.com/tools/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;Config Advisor&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;against the system to make sure there are no issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another possibility is ensuring that you are have disabled flow control on the 10g interfaces and that the MTU matches on the NetApp/Switch/VMware/Hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have OnCommand Unified and Performance manager deployed or AutoSupport turned on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 16:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109543#M7958</guid>
      <dc:creator>wlorenzo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-08T16:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109613#M7963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for taking an interest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue (slow synchronous writes) presents itself on RHEL 7.1, 7.0 and an older Ubuntu server. &amp;nbsp;It is also present on our ESX servers with NFS datastores. &amp;nbsp;We don't have the issue from any of those with the older FAS2040 so I assume (dangerous)&amp;nbsp;it isn't client related.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is present on any of our mount points on any aggregate on any LIF on the new filer. &amp;nbsp;(Yes I triple checked that the LIFs / aggregates / nodes line up.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We do have VSC installed on vCenter with the VAAI plugin installed and have optimized the settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config Advisor did suggest that we turn off flow control and this has been done on all 10Gbe ports. (Made no discernable difference.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For various reasons we still have MTU set to 1500 for the clients and the filers. &amp;nbsp;Although this may not be optimal it shouldn't have a 7x impact on performance (from what I've read) and it is the same for the old filer that performs well enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AutoSupport is turned on but we do not have OnCommand Unified and Performance manager set up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Derek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109613#M7963</guid>
      <dc:creator>shider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-09T20:08:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109614#M7964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Right, but the 2040s ran 7mode, which has much different NFS architecture than cDOT. For instance, there is a notion of NFS flow control in cDOT that doesn't exist in 7mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RPC slot issue has been known to cause perf issues and could cause a domino effect if another client is eating up all the RPC slots. (bully client)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109614#M7964</guid>
      <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-09T20:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109654#M7965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Current thinking is that this is related to&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=896685" target="_blank"&gt;http://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=896685&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is addressed in 8.3.1. &amp;nbsp;We will be updating tonight to see if it fixes the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fingers crossed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109654#M7965</guid>
      <dc:creator>shider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-10T15:46:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor NFS synchronous performance on FAS2552</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109655#M7966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The good news is that 8.3.1 is GA today. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it works out for you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-and-Storage-Protocols/Poor-NFS-synchronous-performance-on-FAS2552/m-p/109655#M7966</guid>
      <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-10T15:49:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

